Let A —> B be a local homomorphism of Noetherian local rings. Assume A —> B is formally smooth in the mB-adic topology. Then A —> B is flat. See Tag 07NP.
PS: Of course much more is true, see Tag 07NQ.
Let A be a ring. Let I ⊂ J ⊂ A be ideals. If M is J-adically complete and I is finitely generated, then M is I-adically complete. See Tag 090T.
Let X be a scheme. Let a : X —> Spec(k1) and b : X —> Spec(k2) be morphisms from X to spectra of fields. Assume a,b are locally of finite type, and X is reduced, and connected. Then we have k′1 = k′2, where k′i ⊂ Γ(X,OX) is the integral closure of ki in Γ(X,OX). See Tag 04MK.
Let X —> Y —> Z be morphism of schemes. Let P be one of the following properties of morphisms of schemes: flat, locally finite type, locally finite presentation. Assume that X —> Z has P and that {X —> Y} can be refined by an fppf covering of Y. Then Y —> Z is P. See Tag 06NB.
So this is a follow up on the post about Burch’s theorem. Namely, I’ve just learned in the last month or so that the next case of this is in Eisenbud + Buchsbaum Algebra structures for finite free resolutions, and some structure theorems for ideals of codimension 3. It says that the resolution of a codimension 3 Gorenstein singularity R/I with R regular has a free resolution of the form
0 —> R —> R^n —f—> R^n —> R
where f is an alternating matrix and the other arrows are given by Pfaffians of f.
Moreover, if R/J is an almost complete intersection of grade 3, then R/J is linked to a Gorenstein R/I as above and a similar type of resolution can be obtained (results of Brown, kustin, etc).
OK, this is cool, very cool.
It seems completely clear that similarly to Burch’s theorem this implies that such a singularity is unobstructed, just as in the codimension 2 Cohen-Macaulay case. To be precise, as a simple consequence of the paper we obtain:
If R = k[[x, y, z]] and R —> S is an Artinian quotient ring such that either (1) S is Gorenstein, or (2) the kernel of R —> S is generated by at most 4 elements, then the miniversal deformation space of S is a power series ring over k.
Right…?
What I’d like is a reference to articles (with page and line numbers) stating exactly the above for (1) and (2). A generic reference to unobstructedness of determinantal singularities doesn’t count. I’ve googled and binged, but no luck so far. Can you help?
Or maybe this is just one of the innumerable results in our field that are so clearly true that you cannot formulate it in a paper as your paper will be immediately rejected?
Let (An) be an inverse system of abelian groups. The following are equivalent
See Tag 091C.
Let A be a Noetherian ring and I ⊂ A an ideal. For every n let M_n be a flat A/I^n-module. Let M_{n + 1} —> M_n be a surjective A-module map. Then the inverse limit M =lim M_n is a flat A-module (see Tag 0912).
Since the last update we have added the following material:
This brings us up to May 1 of this year. At that point I started to work on a chapter on pro-\’etale cohomology, in order to advertise work by Bhargav Bhatt and Peter Scholze in some lectures in Stockholm (KTH). The authors graciously send me a copy of their (for the moment) unfinished manuscript. The chapter covers only a small part of their material, leading up to the definition of constructible complexes and the proper base change theorem. All mistakes are mine. I’ve tried to put most of the background material in other chapters. As is usual for the Stacks project, whenever you try to add something new you are forced to add a lot of background material to go along with it. Here is a list of some of the things we added.
Enjoy!
Pieter Belmans is currently coding and testing a new version of the Stacks project website. What would be very useful is to have some more feedback from you, the user! Please leave a comment on this blog post if
Any suggestions, annoyances, recommendations, etc will be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Geeks only: Of course, just like the Stacks project itself, the Stacks project website is an open source project and you can hack it yourself if you want and know how to. To get your work incorporated back into the site, you may want to talk to Pieter before doing too much work. Send us those cool layouts, visualizations, web-apps, etc, please!
Please move along if you are not a nerd: nothing to see here.
Still here? OK, so occasionally I try to see if embedded pdf viewers will open a pdf at a named destination. In the past the only setup that did this was using adobe reader. But yesterday I discovered that it now works with google chrome and its built in pdf reader! BUT… you have to use the format
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/download/algebra.pdf#nameddest=0567
because the more compact version
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/download/algebra.pdf#0567
doesn’t work. (You will need a reasonably up to date version of chrome.) Today I discovered that it also works with firefox on my ubuntu system. In fact both versions of the link work. It turns out that the Ubuntu firefox browser uses Mozilla’s built pdf viewer. If this is not already installed on your system you can install it as an add on — here is a link. However, on my 64 bit gentoo system, it still didn’t work until I installed the development version of pdf.js you can find here.
Unfortunately, the cross file links (e.g. a reference to a lemma in the algebra chapter from another chapter) do not (yet) work for chrome/libpdf.so and firefox/pdf.js. This used to work with the adobe reader (for example on windows) and works with the rekonq/okular combination on kde.
Test it on your system. I’d love some feedback.
Does this work for you? Leave a comment. Thanks!