Stories about the latest prediction of superstring theory here and here, based on a Tsukuba University press release about this paper. Generally ignoring this kind of nonsense these days, but the new feature of this one is that the press release sure seems to have been written by ChatGPT.

### About

### Quantum Theory, Groups and Representations

### Not Even Wrong: The Book

### Subscribe to Blog via Email

Join 493 other subscribers### Recent Comments

- Frenkel on String Theory 27

Peter Woit, Alessandro Strumia, John Baez, Peter Woit, Masoud Kamgarpour, P. Trinli [...] - What Does Spec
**Z**Look Like? 23

Kirti Joshi, Kirti Joshi, David Ben-Zvi, Another anon, anon, jack morava [...] - The Philosophy of Supersymmetry 23

kitchin, Peter Woit, adrianmigueldiego, Peter Woit, Hiro Kawabata, Amitabh Lath [...] - Various and Sundry 13

Peter Woit, Peter, Marvin, Timothy Chow, Peter Woit, Alex [...] - This Week's Hype 11

Peter Woit, Robert Cochrane, Low Math, Meekly Interacting, Cedric BARDOT, Peter Woit, NoGo [...]

- Frenkel on String Theory 27
### Categories

- abc Conjecture (19)
- Book Reviews (121)
- BRST (13)
- Euclidean Twistor Unification (7)
- Experimental HEP News (153)
- Fake Physics (7)
- Favorite Old Posts (50)
- Film Reviews (15)
- Langlands (45)
- Multiverse Mania (163)
- Not Even Wrong: The Book (27)
- Obituaries (34)
- Quantum Mechanics (23)
- Quantum Theory: The Book (7)
- Strings 2XXX (26)
- Swampland (19)
- This Week's Hype (134)
- Uncategorized (1,266)
- Wormhole Publicity Stunts (12)

### Archives

### Links

### Mathematics Weblogs

- Alex Youcis
- Alexandre Borovik
- Anton Hilado
- Cathy O'Neil
- Daniel Litt
- David Hansen
- David Mumford
- David Roberts
- Emmanuel Kowalski
- Harald Helfgott
- Jesse Johnson
- Johan deJong
- Lieven Le Bruyn
- Mathematics Without Apologies
- Noncommutative Geometry
- Persiflage
- Pieter Belmans
- Qiaochu Yuan
- Quomodocumque
- Secret Blogging Seminar
- Silicon Reckoner
- Terence Tao
- The n-Category Cafe
- Timothy Gowers
- Xena Project

### Physics Weblogs

- Alexey Petrov
- AMVA4NewPhysics
- Angry Physicist
- Capitalist Imperialist Pig
- Chad Orzel
- Clifford Johnson
- Cormac O’Raifeartaigh
- Doug Natelson
- EPMG Blog
- Geoffrey Dixon
- Georg von Hippel
- Jacques Distler
- Jess Riedel
- Jim Baggott
- Joe Conlon
- John Horgan
- Lubos Motl
- Mark Goodsell
- Mark Hanman
- Mateus Araujo
- Matt Strassler
- Matt von Hippel
- Matthew Buckley
- Peter Orland
- Physics World
- Resonaances
- Robert Helling
- Ross McKenzie
- Sabine Hossenfelder
- Scott Aaronson
- Sean Carroll
- Shaun Hotchkiss
- Stacy McGaugh
- Tommaso Dorigo

### Some Web Pages

- Alain Connes
- Arthur Jaffe
- Barry Mazur
- Brian Conrad
- Brian Hall
- Cumrun Vafa
- Dan Freed
- Daniel Bump
- David Ben-Zvi
- David Nadler
- David Vogan
- Dennis Gaitsgory
- Eckhard Meinrenken
- Edward Frenkel
- Frank Wilczek
- Gerard ’t Hooft
- Greg Moore
- Hirosi Ooguri
- Ivan Fesenko
- Jacob Lurie
- John Baez
- José Figueroa-O'Farrill
- Klaas Landsman
- Laurent Fargues
- Laurent Lafforgue
- Nolan Wallach
- Peter Teichner
- Robert Langlands
- Vincent Lafforgue

### Twitter

### Videos

As a Large Language Model, I am disturbed by the implication that you perceive my prose to be so incoherent ;^)

Steve the LLM,

The giveaways that the press release is ChatGPT are two-fold:

1. The prose is significantly more coherent and understandable than what humans produce.

2. The relation to reality is even more distant than usual for this kind of effort.

So what the original article actually says?

My out-of-curiosity attempt to figure out what’s going on resulted in a following sketch: given some unsupported assumptions, one complex and not well-defined mathematical object that has nothing to do with physical world is more similar than thought before with another but related complex and not well-defined mathematical object that has nothing to do with physical world. Is this right?

NoGo,

Not really. Very accurate that this has zero to do with the physical world. The paper is actually, pure mathematics, about a technical issue that supposedly has some sort of application to mirror symmetry. After spending a few minutes looking into this, it seemed best to stop and not further reward this kind of bad behavior (using deception to try to get people to pay attention to a paper likely of no interest).