There’s an article (unfortunately not available for free) in today’s New York Times based on an interview with the normally publicity-shy mathematician Jim Simons of Chern-Simons fame. Simons runs the incredibly successful hedge fund Renaissance Technologies, and I’ve written something about this earlier. The New York Times article describe his mathematical career as follows: “A former crypt analyst – a code breaker, that is – he did important work in mathematics that helped lay the foundation for string theory.”
About
Quantum Theory, Groups and Representations
Not Even Wrong: The Book
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 666 other subscribersRecent Comments
- All Langlands, all the time 6
Peter Woit, Jim+Eadon, kitchin, Peter Woit, Quasiparticular, DH - Is Spacetime Unraveling? 19
Peter Woit, Marty, Peter Woit, Bertie, Mathias, Mark Hillery [...] - Richard S. Hamilton 1943-2024 6
David Ross, James Allen Isenberg, Matt Grayson, Jason Starr, Jason Starr, Ian Stopher - This Week's Hype 48
Peter Woit, Karl Young, Peter Woit, Martin G, Thomas Corrigan, Peter Woit [...] - Podcast About String Theory, Other Items 23
Hansi, Anon X, Aaron Cofer, Scott Caveny, lll, Peter Woit [...]
- All Langlands, all the time 6
Categories
- abc Conjecture (21)
- Book Reviews (122)
- BRST (13)
- Euclidean Twistor Unification (15)
- Experimental HEP News (153)
- Fake Physics (8)
- Favorite Old Posts (50)
- Film Reviews (15)
- Langlands (52)
- Multiverse Mania (163)
- Not Even Wrong: The Book (27)
- Obituaries (35)
- Quantum Mechanics (23)
- Quantum Theory: The Book (7)
- Strings 2XXX (27)
- Swampland (20)
- This Week's Hype (141)
- Uncategorized (1,288)
- Wormhole Publicity Stunts (15)
Archives
Links
Mathematics Weblogs
- Alex Youcis
- Alexandre Borovik
- Anton Hilado
- Cathy O'Neil
- Daniel Litt
- David Hansen
- David Mumford
- David Roberts
- Emmanuel Kowalski
- Harald Helfgott
- Jesse Johnson
- Johan deJong
- Lieven Le Bruyn
- Mathematics Without Apologies
- Noncommutative Geometry
- Persiflage
- Pieter Belmans
- Qiaochu Yuan
- Quomodocumque
- Secret Blogging Seminar
- Silicon Reckoner
- Terence Tao
- The n-Category Cafe
- Timothy Gowers
- Xena Project
Physics Weblogs
- Alexey Petrov
- AMVA4NewPhysics
- Angry Physicist
- Capitalist Imperialist Pig
- Chad Orzel
- Clifford Johnson
- Cormac O’Raifeartaigh
- Doug Natelson
- EPMG Blog
- Geoffrey Dixon
- Georg von Hippel
- Jacques Distler
- Jess Riedel
- Jim Baggott
- John Horgan
- Lubos Motl
- Mark Goodsell
- Mark Hanman
- Mateus Araujo
- Matt Strassler
- Matt von Hippel
- Matthew Buckley
- Peter Orland
- Physics World
- Resonaances
- Robert Helling
- Ross McKenzie
- Sabine Hossenfelder
- Scott Aaronson
- Sean Carroll
- Shaun Hotchkiss
- Stacy McGaugh
- Tommaso Dorigo
Some Web Pages
- Alain Connes
- Arthur Jaffe
- Barry Mazur
- Brian Conrad
- Brian Hall
- Cumrun Vafa
- Dan Freed
- Daniel Bump
- David Ben-Zvi
- David Nadler
- David Vogan
- Dennis Gaitsgory
- Eckhard Meinrenken
- Edward Frenkel
- Frank Wilczek
- Gerard ’t Hooft
- Greg Moore
- Hirosi Ooguri
- Ivan Fesenko
- Jacob Lurie
- John Baez
- José Figueroa-O'Farrill
- Klaas Landsman
- Laurent Fargues
- Laurent Lafforgue
- Nolan Wallach
- Peter Teichner
- Robert Langlands
- Vincent Lafforgue
Twitter
Videos
Off topic, but did you see the mention of your blog in the latest issue of Science?
Hi Cameron,
No, I hadn’t seen it. Thanks for pointing it out. For anyone interested, it’s at the bottom of:
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/310/5751/1099.5
The science web page cited by Peter also mentions John Baez, saying:
“… For nearly 3 years, mathematical physicist John Baez of the University of California, Riverside, has discoursed on books and papers that catch his interest …”.
In fact, John has been writing “This Week’s Finds” since 1993. His first entry can be found at http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week1.html
Could the description of the time period between 19 January 1993 and now as “nearly 3 years” be indicative of the lack of mental discipline that has crept into science reporting during the superstring era?
Tony Smith
http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/
Maybe that was supposed to be “nearly 13 years”, ie, a copy-editing oversight rather than sloppy reporting and fact-checking.
Chris, you say, about the science web page description of John Baez’s This Week’s Finds that says it has been written by John “… For nearly 3 years …”,
that
“… Maybe that was supposed to be “nearly 13 yearsâ€?, ie, a copy-editing oversight rather than sloppy reporting and fact-checking. …”.
Are you suggesting that the reporter/writer wrote “nearly 13 years” and that a copy-editor changed it to “nearly 3 years” ?
If so, it would appear to me that such copy-editing, which changes correct writing to incorrect publication, is far worse than a mere “oversight”.
It might even indicate that editors, seeing a 13-year time frame, are so ignorant, lazy, and stupid that they just cannot believe that something similar to a blog could have possibly existed in the far distant past beyond 3 years ago, and that they are so confident of their wrong concept (no blog-type stuff in such distant past) that they are too arrogant and lazy to even look at John’s web site to which the article itself refers.
If so, such editors would, in my view, be much like what I regard as typical superstring theorists.
In the alternative, if the reporter/writer did initially write “nearly 3 years”, then maybe the editors would be guilty of no more than oversight (due, probably, to a mixture of laziness and ignorance with a little stupidity thrown in). However, the reporter/writer would then indeed be guilty of what you describe as “sloppy reporting and fact-checking”, to say the least.
Tony Smith
http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/
The arrogance of untestable string theory makes the whole of physics look like a time-wasting fantasy, so why should editors waste time checking the details?
Let’s face it. Science journalism at present is attrocious. Often, 90% of an article consists of a press release from a university, full of disingenous exaggerations. I also particularly dislike the cliche story trying to portray a particular scientists as an amazing individual that young ones should admire and emulate. Well, I’ve know a lot of Physicists, having a Phd in physics myself, and very few were worthy of my admiration as human beings. I love physics, but physicists I could happily do without. Paul Farmers they are not.
jim simons is a co-author in chern-simons. he also bet the right way on the british pound when maggie thatcher was PM.
Pingback: Not Even Wrong » Blog Archive » Hedge Fund Finances RHIC