I’ve never really understood how Wikipedia works, especially how it protects itself from getting filled with nonsense. The entry about the Bogdanovs has evidently recently been the subject of repeated attempts by the Bogdanovs to modify it, one can follow the history here. This sort of thing seems to be enough of a problem that steps are being taken to prevent this kind of abuse.
About
Quantum Theory, Groups and Representations
Not Even Wrong: The Book
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 674 other subscribersRecent Comments
- Wick Rotating Weyl Spinor Fields 5
Peter Woit, Arnold Neumaier, Peter Woit, Arnold Neumaier, Matt+Grayson - The Impossible Man 32
Thomas, Cormac O'Raifeartaigh, Phil H, Matthias, Peter Woit, John Baez [...] - This Week's Hype 6
Peter Woit, Peter, Peter Woit, Velvet, Peter Woit, Leo - The Crisis in String Theory is Worse Than You Think... 44
Andy Colombo, Matthew Foster, Mitchell Porter, Scott Caveny, Matthew Foster, Peter Woit [...] - Why Sabine Hossenfelder is Just Wrong 20
Peter Woit, Arnold Neumaier, Peter Woit, Curious Fish, Peter Woit, anon [...]
- Wick Rotating Weyl Spinor Fields 5
Categories
- abc Conjecture (21)
- Book Reviews (123)
- BRST (13)
- Euclidean Twistor Unification (16)
- Experimental HEP News (153)
- Fake Physics (8)
- Favorite Old Posts (50)
- Film Reviews (15)
- Langlands (52)
- Multiverse Mania (163)
- Not Even Wrong: The Book (27)
- Obituaries (35)
- Quantum Mechanics (24)
- Quantum Theory: The Book (7)
- Strings 2XXX (27)
- Swampland (20)
- This Week's Hype (142)
- Uncategorized (1,291)
- Wormhole Publicity Stunts (15)
Archives
Links
Mathematics Weblogs
- Alex Youcis
- Alexandre Borovik
- Anton Hilado
- Cathy O'Neil
- Daniel Litt
- David Hansen
- David Mumford
- David Roberts
- Emmanuel Kowalski
- Harald Helfgott
- Jesse Johnson
- Johan deJong
- Lieven Le Bruyn
- Mathematics Without Apologies
- Noncommutative Geometry
- Persiflage
- Pieter Belmans
- Qiaochu Yuan
- Quomodocumque
- Secret Blogging Seminar
- Silicon Reckoner
- Terence Tao
- The n-Category Cafe
- Timothy Gowers
- Xena Project
Physics Weblogs
- Alexey Petrov
- AMVA4NewPhysics
- Angry Physicist
- Capitalist Imperialist Pig
- Chad Orzel
- Clifford Johnson
- Cormac O’Raifeartaigh
- Doug Natelson
- EPMG Blog
- Geoffrey Dixon
- Georg von Hippel
- Jacques Distler
- Jess Riedel
- Jim Baggott
- John Horgan
- Lubos Motl
- Mark Goodsell
- Mark Hanman
- Mateus Araujo
- Matt Strassler
- Matt von Hippel
- Matthew Buckley
- Peter Orland
- Physics World
- Resonaances
- Robert Helling
- Ross McKenzie
- Sabine Hossenfelder
- Scott Aaronson
- Sean Carroll
- Shaun Hotchkiss
- Stacy McGaugh
- Tommaso Dorigo
Some Web Pages
- Alain Connes
- Arthur Jaffe
- Barry Mazur
- Brian Conrad
- Brian Hall
- Cumrun Vafa
- Dan Freed
- Daniel Bump
- David Ben-Zvi
- David Nadler
- David Vogan
- Dennis Gaitsgory
- Eckhard Meinrenken
- Edward Frenkel
- Frank Wilczek
- Gerard ’t Hooft
- Greg Moore
- Hirosi Ooguri
- Ivan Fesenko
- Jacob Lurie
- John Baez
- José Figueroa-O'Farrill
- Klaas Landsman
- Laurent Fargues
- Laurent Lafforgue
- Nolan Wallach
- Peter Teichner
- Robert Langlands
- Vincent Lafforgue
Twitter
Videos
Wikipedia stores previous versions of itself so changes can be indentified and reverted to the original easily if necessary. There is also a discussion facility for each entry where the rationale for a change can be argued. The battle is won by those nerds who have nothing else to do but keep changing or reverting entries to the way they want. So the Bogdanovs will probably win by sneaky tactics.
I also suspect the vast majority of Wikipedia articles are not controversial or “interesting” enough to attract the sort who would engage in such edit wars. Articles on slime molds and Happy, Texas aren’t go to be targets for this sort of abuse. But when it’s bad, it’s really bad.
Never underestimate the penchant for control among some people.
It’s what keeps many forums moderated.