Category Archives: BRST

For the last couple years I’ve been working on the idea of using what mathematicians call “Dirac Cohomology” to replace the standard BRST formalism for handling gauge symmetries. So far this is just in a toy model: gauge theory in … Continue reading →

Note: I’ve started putting together the material from these postings into a proper document, available here, which will be getting updated as time goes on. I’ll be making changes and additions to the text there, not on the blog postings. … Continue reading →

Clifford Algebras Clifford algebras are well-known to physicists, in the guise of matrix algebras generated by the -matrices first used in the Dirac equation. They also have a more abstract formulation, which will be the topic of this posting. One … Continue reading →

The Casimir element discussed in the last posting of this series is a distinguished quadratic element of the center (note, here is a complex semi-simple Lie algebra), but there are others, all of which will act as scalars on irreducible … Continue reading →

For the case of , it is well-known from the discussion of angular momentum in any quantum mechanics textbook that irreducible representations can be labeled either by j, the highest weight (here, highest eigenvalue of ), or by , the … Continue reading →

I should finish writing the next installment of the Notes on BRST series soon, but thought I’d post here about two pieces of BRST-related news, concerning the “B” and the “T”. The “T” in BRST is I.V. Tyutin, whose Lebedev … Continue reading →

In the last posting we discussed the Lie algebra cohomology for a semi-simple Lie algebra. Because the invariants functor is exact here, this tells us nothing about the structure of irreducible representations in this case. In this posting we’ll consider … Continue reading →

In this posting I’ll work out some examples of Lie algebra cohomology, still for finite dimensional Lie algebras and representations. If is a compact, connected Lie group, it can be thought of as a compact manifold, and as such one … Continue reading →

The Invariants Functor The last posting discussed one of the simplest incarnations of BRST cohomology, in a formalism familiar to physicists. This fits into a much more abstract mathematical context, and that’s what we’ll turn to now. Given a Lie … Continue reading →

My initial plan was to have the second part of these notes be about gauge symmetry and the problems physicists have encountered in handling it, but as I started writing it quickly became apparent that explaining this in any detail … Continue reading →