There a new article on Slate about string theory and my colleague Brian Greene. Also some commentary about it on David Appell’s weblog Quark Soup.

### About

### Not Even Wrong: The Book

### Categories

- Book Reviews (62)
- BRST (12)
- Experimental HEP News (148)
- Fake Physics (2)
- Langlands (24)
- Multiverse Mania (131)
- Not Even Wrong: The Book (27)
- Quantum Mechanics (10)
- Quantum Theory: The Book (2)
- Strings 2XXX (16)
- This Week's Hype (89)
- Uncategorized (1,157)

### Recent Comments

- New LHC Results 18

Peter Woit, pval, Yatima, Thomas Larsson, Peter Woit, new [...] - This Time It's For Real 37

Georges E., Peter Woit, Anonymous, Peter Woit, Peter Woit, Peter Woit [...] - Reality is Not What It Seems 18

Richard J. Gaylord, Richard Gaylord, Curious Wavefunction, Narad, neil, martibal [...] - Can the Laws of Physics be Unified? 25

Jeff M, Peter Woit, jd, Peter Woit, Jeff M, Peter Woit [...] - A Big Bang in a Little Room 19

Slawomir Piotr Wojcik, Jeff M, Bernhard, Alan, Mateus AraÃºjo, Nick M. [...]

- New LHC Results 18
### Archives

### Links

### Mathematics Weblogs

- Alex Youcis
- Alexandre Borovik
- Cathy O'Neil
- Daniel Litt
- Danny Calegari
- David Hansen
- David Mumford
- Emmanuel Kowalski
- Harald Helfgott
- Jesse Johnson
- Johan deJong
- Lieven Le Bruyn
- Mathematics Without Apologies
- Michael Hutchings
- Motivic Stuff
- Noncommutative Geometry
- Pieter Belmans
- Qiaochu Yuan
- Quomodocumque
- Rigorous Trivialities
- Secret Blogging Seminar
- Terence Tao
- The n-Category Cafe
- Timothy Gowers

### Physics Weblogs

- Alexey Petrov
- AMVA4NewPhysics
- Andrew Jaffe
- Angry Physicist
- Capitalist Imperialist Pig
- Chad Orzel
- Charles Day
- Clifford Johnson
- Cormac O’Raifeartaigh
- Doug Natelson
- EPMG Blog
- Georg von Hippel
- Gordon Watts
- Jackson Clarke
- Jacques Distler
- Jennifer Ouellette
- Jim Baggott
- John Horgan
- Kyle Cranmer
- Lubos Motl
- Makoto Sakurai
- Matt Strassler
- Matthew Buckley
- Michael Schmitt
- Norbert Bodendorfer
- Peter Orland
- Physics World
- Resonaances
- Robert Helling
- Ross McKenzie
- Sabine Hossenfelder
- Scott Aaronson
- Sesh Nadathur
- Shaun Hotchkiss
- Shores of the Dirac Sea
- Stacey McGaugh
- Steve Hsu
- Tommaso Dorigo

### Twitter

### Meta

Urs, your comment is that of the apologist.

It’s perfectly possible to give non-equation explanations that hang together of real physics. It can’t be done for strings because there is nothing to really describe.

Semiclassical elegancePopular descriptions of sciences which involve lots of math are always problematic. An infinity of analogies does not capture the content of an equation. It’s indeed very much like talking about Beethoven’s music without ever listening to it. You will never get the idea, no matter how many words you read about it.

One thing is this common statement that ‘all particles would be vibration modes of string’. While not fully wrong, this completely misses the point that the interesting thing about the superstring’s spectrum is its

masslesspart, where there is essentially no vibration at all!There is however sort of a ‘supervibration’ since the fermionic worldhseet modes are excited. The nature of the massless spectrum is in fact much better understood in terms of representation theory, very much as for point particles.

I once tried to give a semi-popular description of how the superstring’s spectrum really arises, trying to improve on the ‘particles are violin string notes’-statement.

If one is really interested in the pedagogy of string theory, i.e. in finding better ways to get this abstract formal entity into semi-laymen’s brains, then I would rather recommend for instance the ‘Geometric Algebra‘ approach, as a neat notational framework to fill all kinds of spinor constructions with life. For instance I claim that the world sheet spin fields that generate the Ramond-sector states of string, and hence the target space fermions, are nothing but slightly souped up ‘rotors’ that they are so very fond of in Hestenes’ school of thinking about spin geometry.

(As you all know and appreciate, every good idea is part of string theory – and rotors are a good idea. ðŸ˜‰

By the way, in the slate article that Peter mentioned it says:

Heh, I like that: ‘Semiclassical elegance’! ðŸ™‚ If we could just fully quantize elegance Brian Greene might after all be able to prove that string theory is quantum-elegant. There might be quantum corrections to that, but I suspect most of the string’s elegance is protected by supersymmetry or is dual to its romaticism.

Pingback: Preposterous Universe