About
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions (under construction)Not Even Wrong: The Book
Categories
- Book Reviews (32)
- BRST (12)
- Experimental HEP News (136)
- Langlands (14)
- Multiverse Mania (75)
- Not Even Wrong: The Book (26)
- Strings 2XXX (9)
- This Week's Hype (68)
- Uncategorized (955)
Recent Comments
- Kenneth Wilson 1936-2013 6
King Ray, gs, meet, Raisonator, Peter Woit, Igor Khavkine - Farewell to Reality 70
Peter Woit, piscator, Peter Woit, MathematicianNotPhysicist, cormac, amused [...] - This Week's Hype 2
M, Tom H - Nature at the energy frontier 33
Peter Woit, Dom, Dom, Peter Woit, amused, amused [...] - Nature on the new Nobels 14
annamaria, srp, fuzzy, Juan Francisco, Pepe, Tmark48 [...]
- Kenneth Wilson 1936-2013 6
Archives
Links
Mathematics Weblogs
- Alexandre Borovik
- Antwerp Noncommutative Geometry Seminar
- Automorphic Forum
- Cathy O'Neil
- Chromotopy
- Concrete Nonsense
- Danny Calegari
- DZB's blog
- Emmanuel Kowalski
- Jeffrey Morton
- Jesse Johnson
- Johan deJong
- Lieven Le Bruyn
- Michael Hutchings
- Motivic Stuff
- Noncommutative Geometry
- Quomodocumque
- Rigorous Trivialities
- Secret Blogging Seminar
- Terence Tao
- The n-Category Cafe
- Timothy Gowers
Physics Weblogs
- Alexey Petrov
- Andrew Jaffe
- Angry Physicist
- Capitalist Imperialist Pig
- Chad Orzel
- Charles Day
- Christine Dantas
- Clifford Johnson
- Cormac O’Raifeartaigh
- Cosmic Variance
- Dmitry Podolsky
- Doug Natelson
- EPMG Blog
- Georg von Hippel
- Gordon Watts
- Jacques Distler
- Jennifer Ouellette
- Jim Rohlf
- John Horgan
- John Terning
- Jonathan Shock
- Lubos Motl
- Makoto Sakurai
- Martin Perl
- Matt Strassler
- Michael Schmitt
- Philip Gibbs
- Physics World
- Resonaances
- Rhys Davies
- Robert Helling
- Sabine Hossenfelder/Stefan Scherer
- Scott Aaronson
- Shores of the Dirac Sea
- Steve Hsu
- Sujit Datta
- Tommaso Dorigo
Meta
Quick Links
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Pingback: Career advice from the Fields medalists and some other mathematicians « Successful Researcher
try this link:
http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen
To stand a chance at “snarXiv vs. arXiv” I would need the abstracts, I guess, with the titles alone I don’t get above 70%.
What got me in the first run was, for example, “non-compact compactification” (that’s probably too absurd to be computer generated).
snarxiv is hilarious. Another one, though more sad (because the posters are completely serious), is viXra.org.
Arnold’s death is really a sad news.
Thanks for pointing out vixra.org – some of that stuff is really entertaining
and some of it really is serious. That is, it’s not a joke.
-drl
DR,
One of the regulars on that site is a Mister Victor Porton, who believes his math discoveries have earned him the Abel prize:
http://www.mathematics21.org/abel-prize.html
Thanks for the link to snarXiv. One of the papers that got me had “new old inflation” in the title … I figured that one couldn’t possibly be real. Wrong!
When you get 4 out of 4 right it calls you “Nobel Prize winner” and then if you get 5 out of 5 it says “Ed–is that you?”, beyond that I have not tried to go.
Porton’s request reminds me of a Russian beer ad I saw once. I cannot remember the brand, but the poster showed a bottle with the caption: “Buy our beer. We need your money.”
> and then if you get 5 out of 5 it says “Ed–is that you?”
No. The Ed sentence is random for 100% results.
Ed, I only made 5 tries in all and got 5 out of 5, all I know is that is what it said. Didn’t explore further. You could be right.
I got to a Nobel Prize straight off, then got them all wrong after that until I was worse than a monkey.
Another topic:- Witten’s string-twistor marriage is getting an airing at:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=simple-twist-of-fate
Pingback: Ars Mathematica