### About

### Not Even Wrong: The Book

### Categories

- Book Reviews (43)
- BRST (12)
- Experimental HEP News (138)
- Langlands (18)
- Multiverse Mania (95)
- Not Even Wrong: The Book (26)
- Quantum Mechanics (5)
- Strings 2XXX (13)
- This Week's Hype (71)
- Uncategorized (1,023)

### Recent Comments

- Grand Unification of Mathematics and Physics 1

Urs Schreiber - Nature is Fundamentally Conformally Invariant 17

Peter Orland, Peter Orland, vmarko, AlsoConfused, vmarko, Shouhong Wang [...] - Quantum Theory is Representation Theory 38

Peter Woit, Marty Tysanner, Thomas Larsson, Peter Woit, Reader297, Marty Tysanner [...] - Smashing Physics 5

Curious Mayhem, Timothy, Dom, srp, Marc C - 2014 Fields Medals 53

shaghayegh maruphi, Shankar, Peter Woit, Harry, Ethan, Ethan [...]

- Grand Unification of Mathematics and Physics 1
### Archives

### Links

### Mathematics Weblogs

- Alexandre Borovik
- Antwerp Noncommutative Geometry Seminar
- Automorphic Forum
- Cathy O'Neil
- Chromotopy
- Concrete Nonsense
- Danny Calegari
- DZB's blog
- Emmanuel Kowalski
- Jeffrey Morton
- Jesse Johnson
- Johan deJong
- Lieven Le Bruyn
- Michael Hutchings
- Motivic Stuff
- Noncommutative Geometry
- Quomodocumque
- Rigorous Trivialities
- Secret Blogging Seminar
- Terence Tao
- The n-Category Cafe
- Timothy Gowers

### Physics Weblogs

- Alexey Petrov
- Andrew Jaffe
- Angry Physicist
- Capitalist Imperialist Pig
- Chad Orzel
- Charles Day
- Christine Dantas
- Clifford Johnson
- Cormac O’Raifeartaigh
- Cosmic Variance
- Dmitry Podolsky
- Doug Natelson
- EPMG Blog
- Georg von Hippel
- Gordon Watts
- Jacques Distler
- Jennifer Ouellette
- Jim Rohlf
- John Horgan
- John Terning
- Jonathan Shock
- Kyle Cranmer
- Lubos Motl
- Makoto Sakurai
- Martin Perl
- Matt Strassler
- Michael Schmitt
- Philip Gibbs
- Physics World
- Resonaances
- Rhys Davies
- Robert Helling
- Sabine Hossenfelder/Stefan Scherer
- Scott Aaronson
- Sesh Nadathur
- Shaun Hotchkiss
- Shores of the Dirac Sea
- Steve Hsu
- Sujit Datta
- Tommaso Dorigo

### Meta

# Quick Links

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Pingback: Career advice from the Fields medalists and some other mathematicians « Successful Researcher

try this link:

http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen

To stand a chance at “snarXiv vs. arXiv” I would need the abstracts, I guess, with the titles alone I don’t get above 70%.

What got me in the first run was, for example, “non-compact compactification” (that’s probably too absurd to be computer generated).

snarxiv is hilarious. Another one, though more sad (because the posters are completely serious), is viXra.org.

Arnold’s death is really a sad news.

Thanks for pointing out vixra.org – some of that stuff is really entertaining and some of it really is serious. That is, it’s not a joke.

-drl

DR,

One of the regulars on that site is a Mister Victor Porton, who believes his math discoveries have earned him the Abel prize:

http://www.mathematics21.org/abel-prize.html

Thanks for the link to snarXiv. One of the papers that got me had “new old inflation” in the title … I figured that one couldn’t possibly be real. Wrong!

When you get 4 out of 4 right it calls you “Nobel Prize winner” and then if you get 5 out of 5 it says “Ed–is that you?”, beyond that I have not tried to go.

Porton’s request reminds me of a Russian beer ad I saw once. I cannot remember the brand, but the poster showed a bottle with the caption: “Buy our beer. We need your money.”

> and then if you get 5 out of 5 it says “Ed–is that you?”

No. The Ed sentence is random for 100% results.

Ed, I only made 5 tries in all and got 5 out of 5, all I know is that is what it said. Didn’t explore further. You could be right.

I got to a Nobel Prize straight off, then got them all wrong after that until I was worse than a monkey.

Another topic:- Witten’s string-twistor marriage is getting an airing at:

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=simple-twist-of-fate

Pingback: Ars Mathematica