### About

### Not Even Wrong: The Book

### Categories

- Book Reviews (53)
- BRST (12)
- Experimental HEP News (144)
- Langlands (22)
- Multiverse Mania (118)
- Not Even Wrong: The Book (26)
- Quantum Mechanics (9)
- Strings 2XXX (14)
- This Week's Hype (83)
- Uncategorized (1,104)

### Recent Comments

- Rutgers Talk 40

Peter Woit, Radioactive, random reader, Peter Woit, Radioactive, random reader [...] - White Smoke Over Oxford? 37

Peter Woit, David Roberts, Peter Woit, Rh L, Brian Conrad, random reader [...] - Some News 29

Peter Woit, 30 inverse fb of pp collisions this year, Alex, Peter Woit, chris, A.J. [...] - Back at Work 9

Anonyrat, Bernd, Yatima, Peter Woit, John, Chris Kennedy [...] - Hitler doesn't get a postdoc in High Energy Theory 38

Peter Woit, Shantanu, gadfly, Low Math, Meekly Interacting, Alex K, twistor [...]

- Rutgers Talk 40
### Archives

### Links

### Mathematics Weblogs

- Alex Youcis
- Alexandre Borovik
- Antwerp Noncommutative Geometry Seminar
- Automorphic Forum
- Cathy O'Neil
- Chromotopy
- Concrete Nonsense
- Danny Calegari
- David Hansen
- David Mumford
- DZB's blog
- Emmanuel Kowalski
- Jeffrey Morton
- Jesse Johnson
- Johan deJong
- Lieven Le Bruyn
- Mathematics Without Apologies
- Michael Hutchings
- Motivic Stuff
- Noncommutative Geometry
- Pieter Belmans
- Qiaochu Yuan
- Quomodocumque
- Rigorous Trivialities
- Secret Blogging Seminar
- Terence Tao
- The n-Category Cafe
- Timothy Gowers

### Physics Weblogs

- Alexey Petrov
- Andrew Jaffe
- Angry Physicist
- Capitalist Imperialist Pig
- Chad Orzel
- Charles Day
- Christine Dantas
- Clifford Johnson
- Cormac O’Raifeartaigh
- Cosmic Variance
- Dmitry Podolsky
- Doug Natelson
- EPMG Blog
- Georg von Hippel
- Gordon Watts
- Jackson Clarke
- Jackson Clarke
- Jacques Distler
- Jennifer Ouellette
- Jim Baggott
- Jim Rohlf
- John Horgan
- John Terning
- Jonathan Shock
- Kyle Cranmer
- Lubos Motl
- Makoto Sakurai
- Martin Perl
- Matt Strassler
- Michael Schmitt
- Peter Orland
- Philip Gibbs
- Physics World
- Resonaances
- Rhys Davies
- Robert Helling
- Ross McKenzie
- Sabine Hossenfelder/Stefan Scherer
- Scott Aaronson
- Sesh Nadathur
- Shaun Hotchkiss
- Shores of the Dirac Sea
- Steve Hsu
- Sujit Datta
- Tommaso Dorigo

### Meta

# Quick Links

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Pingback: Career advice from the Fields medalists and some other mathematicians « Successful Researcher

try this link:

http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen

To stand a chance at “snarXiv vs. arXiv” I would need the abstracts, I guess, with the titles alone I don’t get above 70%.

What got me in the first run was, for example, “non-compact compactification” (that’s probably too absurd to be computer generated).

snarxiv is hilarious. Another one, though more sad (because the posters are completely serious), is viXra.org.

Arnold’s death is really a sad news.

Thanks for pointing out vixra.org – some of that stuff is really entertaining and some of it really is serious. That is, it’s not a joke.

-drl

DR,

One of the regulars on that site is a Mister Victor Porton, who believes his math discoveries have earned him the Abel prize:

http://www.mathematics21.org/abel-prize.html

Thanks for the link to snarXiv. One of the papers that got me had “new old inflation” in the title … I figured that one couldn’t possibly be real. Wrong!

When you get 4 out of 4 right it calls you “Nobel Prize winner” and then if you get 5 out of 5 it says “Ed–is that you?”, beyond that I have not tried to go.

Porton’s request reminds me of a Russian beer ad I saw once. I cannot remember the brand, but the poster showed a bottle with the caption: “Buy our beer. We need your money.”

> and then if you get 5 out of 5 it says “Ed–is that you?”

No. The Ed sentence is random for 100% results.

Ed, I only made 5 tries in all and got 5 out of 5, all I know is that is what it said. Didn’t explore further. You could be right.

I got to a Nobel Prize straight off, then got them all wrong after that until I was worse than a monkey.

Another topic:- Witten’s string-twistor marriage is getting an airing at:

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=simple-twist-of-fate

Pingback: Ars Mathematica