Pierre Cartier has written a short biographical article about the remarkable French mathematician Jean Dieudonné. Cartier estimates that Dieudonné wrote about 80,000 pages of mathematics over the course of his career. He was a driving force behind Bourbaki, often taking on the bulk of the writing tasks. With Alexandre Grothendieck he co-wrote EGA, the huge foundational text on algebraic geometry (some people note that, considering the French meaning of his name, this text could be described as “God-given”).
About
Quantum Theory, Groups and Representations
Not Even Wrong: The Book
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 676 other subscribersRecent Comments
- Epistemic Collapse at the WSJ 68
Peter Woit, Einekleine, Peter Woit, GS, Thomas Larsson, Peter Woit [...] - Bad Craziness 90
Peter Woit, ghassan salem, Raoul Ohio, Peter Woit, Raoul Ohio, Mike [...] - The Situation at Columbia XXXII 41
Peter Woit, Peter Woit, Anonymous, Peter Orland, Bob Sinclar, Peter Woit [...] - Pet Peeves 47
Peter Woit, Brathmore, Peter Woit, Shantanu, Peter Woit, Gavin [...] - The Situation at Columbia XXIX 11
John Baez, Peter Woit, a former Columbia physics student, Peter Woit, a former Columbia physics student, Tony [...]
- Epistemic Collapse at the WSJ 68
Categories
- abc Conjecture (21)
- Book Reviews (123)
- BRST (13)
- Euclidean Twistor Unification (16)
- Experimental HEP News (154)
- Fake Physics (8)
- Favorite Old Posts (50)
- Film Reviews (15)
- Langlands (52)
- Multiverse Mania (163)
- Not Even Wrong: The Book (27)
- Obituaries (35)
- Quantum Mechanics (24)
- Quantum Theory: The Book (7)
- Strings 2XXX (28)
- Swampland (20)
- The Situation at Columbia (33)
- This Week's Hype (146)
- Uncategorized (1,312)
- Wormhole Publicity Stunts (15)
Archives
Links
Mathematics Weblogs
- Alex Youcis
- Alexandre Borovik
- Anton Hilado
- Cathy O'Neil
- Daniel Litt
- David Hansen
- David Mumford
- David Roberts
- Emmanuel Kowalski
- Harald Helfgott
- Jesse Johnson
- Johan deJong
- Lieven Le Bruyn
- Mathematics Without Apologies
- Noncommutative Geometry
- Persiflage
- Pieter Belmans
- Qiaochu Yuan
- Quomodocumque
- Secret Blogging Seminar
- Silicon Reckoner
- Terence Tao
- The n-Category Cafe
- Timothy Gowers
- Xena Project
Physics Weblogs
- Alexey Petrov
- AMVA4NewPhysics
- Angry Physicist
- Capitalist Imperialist Pig
- Chad Orzel
- Clifford Johnson
- Cormac O’Raifeartaigh
- Doug Natelson
- EPMG Blog
- Geoffrey Dixon
- Georg von Hippel
- Jacques Distler
- Jess Riedel
- Jim Baggott
- John Horgan
- Lubos Motl
- Mark Goodsell
- Mark Hanman
- Mateus Araujo
- Matt Strassler
- Matt von Hippel
- Matthew Buckley
- Peter Orland
- Physics World
- Resonaances
- Robert Helling
- Ross McKenzie
- Sabine Hossenfelder
- Scott Aaronson
- Sean Carroll
- Shaun Hotchkiss
- Stacy McGaugh
- Tommaso Dorigo
Some Web Pages
- Alain Connes
- Arthur Jaffe
- Barry Mazur
- Brian Conrad
- Brian Hall
- Cumrun Vafa
- Dan Freed
- Daniel Bump
- David Ben-Zvi
- David Nadler
- David Vogan
- Dennis Gaitsgory
- Eckhard Meinrenken
- Edward Frenkel
- Frank Wilczek
- Gerard ’t Hooft
- Greg Moore
- Hirosi Ooguri
- Ivan Fesenko
- Jacob Lurie
- John Baez
- José Figueroa-O'Farrill
- Klaas Landsman
- Laurent Fargues
- Laurent Lafforgue
- Nolan Wallach
- Peter Teichner
- Robert Langlands
- Vincent Lafforgue
Twitter
Videos
I was told in such a way as to believe it, that one of those “new math” Bourbaki tomes boasted about the lack of diagrams and heuristics to be found within – as if to say, knowledge must be gained in some exquisite way in order for it to have value. This is the heart of the string debacle. Academics have become exquisites.
-drl
Yep, Bourbaki in some introduction boasts a bit about this, ie about not using didactics as a substitute of proofs. It aims, as Streater/Wightman, for precision.
I can not think about any string book similar in style (nor precision) to the ones of Bourbaki, so perhaps it is a bad comparison.