Since the last updateon October 12 we have added the following material

- Gabber’s argument that categories of quasi-coherent modules form a Grothendieck abelian category (for schemes, spaces, and algebraic stacks),
- an example of an fpqc space which is not an algebraic space,
- an example of a quasi-compact non-quasi-separated morphism of schemes such that pushforward does not preserve quasi-coherency,
- some material related to my course on commutative algebra: exercise, lemmas, shorten proof of ZMT, etc
- introduced lisse-etale (and flat-fppf) sites,
- functoriality of lisse-etale topos for smooth morphisms (and flat-fppf for flat morphisms),
- material on Grothendieck abelian categories, incuding existence of injectives and existence of enough K-injective complexes (following Spaltenstein and Serp\’e),
- cohomology of unbounded complexes and adjointness of Lf^* and Rf_*,
- a lot of material on D_{QCoh}(X) for an algebraic stack X, including Rf_* (on bounded below for quasi-compact and quasi-separated morphisms) and Lf^* (unbounded for general f).

In particular my suggestion in this post worked out exactly as advertised. The existence of Rf_* is straightforward. It turns out that once you prove that the category D_{QCoh}(X) as defined in the blog post is equivalent to the version of D_{QCoh}(X) in L-MB or Martin Olsson’s paper (i.e. defined using the lisse-etale site), then you immediately obtain the existence of Lf^*. Namely, the existence of the lisse-etale site is used to prove that the Verdier quotient used to define D_{QCoh}(X) is a Bousfield colocalization (technically it is easier to use the flat-fppf site to do this, because we use the fppf topology as our default topology, but one can use either).

A bit of care is needed when working with the lisse-etale site and the lisse-etale topos. As discussed elsewhere, one reason is that the lisse-etale topos isn’t functorial for morphisms of algebraic stacks. Here is a another. There is a comparison morphism of topoi

g : Sh(X_{lisse,etale}) —-> Sh(X_{etale})

The functor g^{-1} has a left adjoint denoted g_! (on sheaves of sets) and we have g^{-1}g_! = g^{-1}g_* = id. This means that Sh(X_{lisse,etale}) is an *essential subtopos* of Sh(X_{etale}), see SGA 4, IV, 7.6 and 9.1.1. Let K be a sheaf of sets on X_{lisse,etale}. Let I be an injective abelian sheaf on X_{etale}. Question: H^p(K, g^{-1}I) = 0? In other words, is the pullback by g of an injective abelian sheaf limp? If true this would be a convenient way to compare cohomology of sheaves on X_{etale} with cohomology of sheaves on the lisse-etale site. Unfortunately, we think this isn’t true (Bhargav made what is likely a counter example — but we haven’t fully written out all the details).

Pingback: Update | Stacks Project Blog