{"id":8578,"date":"2016-06-13T16:36:35","date_gmt":"2016-06-13T20:36:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=8578"},"modified":"2016-06-13T17:54:28","modified_gmt":"2016-06-13T21:54:28","slug":"some-history-of-science","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=8578","title":{"rendered":"Some History of Science"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The period of the &#8220;String Wars&#8221; has now receded far enough into the past that it has become a topic of interest to historians of science.  I learned today from Sabine Hossenfelder&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/backreaction.blogspot.com\/2016\/06\/string-phenomenology-of-somewhat.html\">round-up<\/a> of various articles addressing the history and sociology of string theory that Sophie Ritson has published an <a href=\"http:\/\/sss.sagepub.com\/content\/early\/2016\/06\/03\/0306312716647508.abstract\">article on the 2006 &#8220;trackback&#8221; controversy<\/a>. It&#8217;s a fairly straight-forward account of that story, based on publicly available sources, emphasizing the interesting issues raised about science blogging.<\/p>\n<p>While the article deals with the 2006 history, what has happened since then sheds some light on the topic, for example making clear that the &#8220;active researcher&#8221; business was always a red herring.  Within a couple years after 2006 I noticed that arXiv trackbacks were appearing to all sorts of sources obviously not &#8220;active researchers&#8221; (for example, Slashdot articles).  I tried to find out what the new arXiv policy was, but got nowhere.  At one point I decided to do some experimental work, setting up <a href=\"https:\/\/stringtheoryfan.wordpress.com\/\">a fanboy string theory<\/a> site, trashing string theory critics and enthusing over the multiverse. An arXiv moderator took a quick look, and decided the anonymous author qualified (see discussion <a href=\"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=3031\">here<\/a>).  I realize this was obnoxious behavior, but thought it at least had a chance of goading the arXiv moderators into revealing their current policy.  No dice.  Every so often I&#8217;ve tried again to contact someone associated with the arXiv to ask what their policy is, but this has never led anywhere. Sabine describes the current arXiv trackback policy as &#8220;one of the arXiv\u2019s best-kept secrets&#8221;.  If you look at <a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/tb\/recent\">recent arXiv trackbacks<\/a> you&#8217;ll see that the list is dominated by links from the excellent MathOverflow site, but also includes links from a wide variety of other sources that clearly are not &#8220;active researchers&#8221; (for instance: New York Times stories, press releases on Phys.org, MIT Technology Review weekly lists of arXiv papers, and Quanta magazine stories).<\/p>\n<p>Besides the secret nature of the current policy, the odd way in which the &#8220;active researcher&#8221; policy came to light is rather remarkable.  This all started back in August 2005 (see <a href=\"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=248\">here<\/a>) and at that point trackbacks pointing to this blog were appearing.  A few months later that stopped and, wondering why, I wasted a lot of time trying to contact people associated with the arXiv to find out what was going on.  I finally heard from a Cornell administrator that links to my blog were not being allowed for an undisclosed reason, and I wrote about that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=353\">here<\/a>.  Sean Carroll picked up the story <a href=\"http:\/\/www.preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/2006\/03\/03\/crackpots-contrarians-and-the-free-market-of-ideas\/\">here<\/a>, and a former member of the arXiv editorial board <a href=\"http:\/\/www.preposterousuniverse.com\/blog\/2006\/03\/03\/crackpots-contrarians-and-the-free-market-of-ideas\/#comment-12768\">revealed<\/a> the &#8220;active researcher&#8221; policy in a comment at that blog entry. This I gather forced Jacques Distler into a public discussion of the policy <a href=\"https:\/\/golem.ph.utexas.edu\/~distler\/blog\/archives\/000760.html\">here<\/a>, which I commented on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=357\">here<\/a>.  The Ritson article covers this part of the story in some detail.<\/p>\n<p>So, bringing 2006 history up to date, I have no idea what the current arXiv trackback policy is, other than that they&#8217;ve found some new criterion other than the &#8220;active researcher&#8221; one to justify blocking trackbacks from Not Even Wrong.  I guess this will remain &#8220;one of the arXiv\u2019s best-kept secrets&#8221;, at least until someone accidentally reveals all in a blog comment somewhere&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The period of the &#8220;String Wars&#8221; has now receded far enough into the past that it has become a topic of interest to historians of science. I learned today from Sabine Hossenfelder&#8217;s round-up of various articles addressing the history and &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=8578\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8578","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8578","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8578"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8578\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8586,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8578\/revisions\/8586"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8578"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8578"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8578"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}