{"id":81,"date":"2004-09-19T13:24:19","date_gmt":"2004-09-19T17:24:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=81"},"modified":"2004-09-19T13:24:19","modified_gmt":"2004-09-19T17:24:19","slug":"string-geometry-at-snowbird","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=81","title":{"rendered":"String Geometry at Snowbird"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Thomas Larsson wrote in a comment mentioning a <A href=\"http:\/\/deseretnews.com\/dn\/view\/0,1249,595070252,00.html\">news story<\/A> that appeared early this past summer in the Deseret Morning News (yes, that&#8217;s Deseret, not Desert; this is a name Mormons use to refer to Utah).  The news story is about a <A href=\"http:\/\/www.physics.utah.edu\/~katrin\/snowbird.html\">conference on &#8220;String Geometry&#8221;<\/A> held at Snowbird, Utah in June.  Evidently at Andy Strominger&#8217;s talk at this conference someone actually mentioned that there were people who were skeptical about string theory and asked him to comment. His response was that &#8220;I hope they&#8217;re wrong, but I can&#8217;t prove it, and I bet my life work on their being wrong&#8221; , which I guess characterizes the attitude of many string theorists these days (&#8220;things don&#8217;t look good, but I&#8217;ve got too much invested in this to give up, so I&#8217;ll keep on engaging in wishful thinking even though I no longer have much of an argument for why I&#8217;m doing this&#8221;).<\/p>\n<p>Many of the talks at the conference are <A href=\"http:\/\/www.physics.utah.edu\/~katrin\/program.html\">online<\/A>.  These include a couple of interesting talks by Gukov and Spradlin about recent work on twistor theory and perturbative Yang-Mills amplitudes, as well as the usual Michael Douglas talk with its wishful thinking that analyzing the astronomically large &#8220;landscape&#8221; will somehow lead to some sort of prediction of something. There&#8217;s also a talk by Radu Tatar about non-Kahler superstring theory backgrounds. I&#8217;ve always wondered about this since I hear from an algebraic geometer colleague that although no one knows whether there are an infinite number of Calabi-Yaus in the Kahler case, if you relax the Kahler condition there definitely are an infinite number of them.  If these non-Kahler backgrounds make sense, you can stop worrying about whether the landscape contains 10^100 or 10^500 possibilities.<\/p>\n<p>Tomorrow here at Columbia my colleague Brian Greene is giving a colloquium on <A href=\"http:\/\/columbia-physics.net\/colloquia_seminars\/colloquia\/2004F-2005S\/20_sep_2004.htm\">&#8220;The State of String Theory&#8221;<\/A>.   His abstract says he&#8217;ll &#8220;assess both its current shortcomings and major achievements&#8221;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Thomas Larsson wrote in a comment mentioning a news story that appeared early this past summer in the Deseret Morning News (yes, that&#8217;s Deseret, not Desert; this is a name Mormons use to refer to Utah). The news story is &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=81\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-81","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=81"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=81"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=81"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=81"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}