{"id":7215,"date":"2014-09-25T13:05:23","date_gmt":"2014-09-25T17:05:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=7215"},"modified":"2014-09-25T13:33:03","modified_gmt":"2014-09-25T17:33:03","slug":"thirtieth-anniversary-of-the-first-superstring-revolution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=7215","title":{"rendered":"Thirtieth Anniversary of the First Superstring Revolution"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Today&#8217;s about the date that I&#8217;d pick for the 30th anniversary of the First Superstring Revolution.  Witten&#8217;s paper <a href=\"http:\/\/inspirehep.net\/record\/15631\">Some Properties of O(32) Superstrings<\/a> arrived at the journal Physics Letters on September 28,1984, so presumably was finished and sent out around September 25.<\/p>\n<p>The effect of this paper on the field was a bombshell. Witten was at the time far and away the most influential person in the field, regularly producing staggeringly original work that was having a huge impact.  The arrival that fall of a preprint from him announcing that he had stopped work on everything else, and now had what looked like a viable, consistent unified theory of everything, one that he claimed was determined by a single parameter and made predictions (&#8220;It predicts axions and stable Nielsen-Olesen vortex lines&#8221;) was the true First Superstring Revolution.<\/p>\n<p>I wrote about this in some detail ten years ago, for the 20th anniversary, so won&#8217;t repeat what is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=66\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=67\">here<\/a>, supplemented by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=69\">comments from Larry Yaffe<\/a>.  For something more recent along the same lines, see <a href=\"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=6806\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Ten years ago the 20th anniversary of the First Superstring Revolution was celebrated with a symposium at Aspen, but as far as I know, no one has organized a 30th anniversary celebration.  There are now many, many known ways of trying to get unification out of strings, with the original 1984 hope that anomaly cancellation gave a more or less unique possibility long gone.   As for unification itself, thirty years later Witten remains a true believer in the vision that came to him in September 1984 (see <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.scientificamerican.com\/cross-check\/2014\/09\/22\/physics-titan-edward-witten-still-thinks-string-theory-on-the-right-track\/\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/samplings\/mathmoments\/mm112-big-bang-podcast\">here<\/a>), although he now seems to see little hope for vindication during his lifetime.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Today&#8217;s about the date that I&#8217;d pick for the 30th anniversary of the First Superstring Revolution. Witten&#8217;s paper Some Properties of O(32) Superstrings arrived at the journal Physics Letters on September 28,1984, so presumably was finished and sent out around &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=7215\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7215","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7215","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7215"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7215\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7218,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7215\/revisions\/7218"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7215"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7215"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7215"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}