{"id":558,"date":"2007-05-15T10:26:35","date_gmt":"2007-05-15T15:26:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=558"},"modified":"2007-08-06T14:10:56","modified_gmt":"2007-08-06T19:10:56","slug":"all-lhc-all-the-time","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=558","title":{"rendered":"All LHC, all the Time"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The LHC media blitz is in full swing, with last week&#8217;s long New Yorker article now followed by an unusually long and detailed New York Times piece titled <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/05\/15\/science\/15cern.html\">A Giant Takes On Physics&#8217; Biggest Questions<\/a>.   Dennis Overbye does an excellent job of covering the story.   Besides the experimentalists actually involved in building the machines, he quotes theorists John Ellis, Joe Lykken, Nima Arkani-Hamed and Michelangelo Mangano.  To distinguish this piece from the New Yorker one, here it&#8217;s Mangano who is the one who consumes a lot of espresso.   There are side-bars about the recent <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/05\/15\/science\/15magnet.html\">problem with the Fermilab magnets<\/a> and about the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/05\/15\/science\/15string.html\">implications for string theory<\/a> (not much).  There&#8217;s a multimedia component to the Times coverage, with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/ref\/science\/20070514_CERN_GRAPHIC.html\">interactive graphics<\/a>, a slide show, a <a href=\"http:\/\/podcasts.nytimes.com\/podcasts\/2007\/05\/14\/15scienceupdate.mp3\">podcast<\/a> (an interview with Arkani-Hamed, described as &#8220;one of the physicists at the center of the project&#8221;), and a <a href=\"http:\/\/video.on.nytimes.com\/?fr_story=7d3e1fbe3b5d0d4bfc5f413456818c69906eb192\">video<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>I do fear all this LHC coverage is peaking too early.  With still probably at least a year to go before the machine even starts taking data, the coverage may already be generating an LHC overexposure problem: see Chad Orzel&#8217;s new posting <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2007\/05\/tired_of_the_lhc.php\">Tired of the LHC<\/a>.  If Chad is already complaining about this, boy is he going to be grumpy about it by a year from now&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>The New Yorker keeps its physics theme going this week with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cartoonbank.com\/item\/123987\">cover art<\/a> that includes a blackboard full of basic equations from quantum mechanics.<\/p>\n<p>The NY Times article includes the usual not very cogent explanation of the role of the Higgs.  For something much better aimed at explaining Higgs-hunting to the general public, see the online interactive presentation <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencemuseum.org.uk\/antenna\/bigbang\/huntforhiggs\/index.asp\">Hunt for Higgs<\/a>, part of a web-site about the LHC called <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencemuseum.org.uk\/antenna\/bigbang\/\">Big Bang<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Blogging may be light the next week or so since I&#8217;ll be traveling.   First stop is Trieste, where I&#8217;ll be speaking at 5pm on Friday as part of a large event there called <a href=\"http:\/\/www.festrieste.it\/\">FEST<\/a>.   From there I&#8217;ll make brief visits to Geneva, Paris and London, back here in New York late next week.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The LHC media blitz is in full swing, with last week&#8217;s long New Yorker article now followed by an unusually long and detailed New York Times piece titled A Giant Takes On Physics&#8217; Biggest Questions. Dennis Overbye does an excellent &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=558\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-558","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/558","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=558"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/558\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=558"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=558"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=558"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}