{"id":5,"date":"2004-03-23T15:49:23","date_gmt":"2004-03-23T19:49:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=5"},"modified":"2004-03-23T15:49:23","modified_gmt":"2004-03-23T19:49:23","slug":"various-stuff-on-the-web","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=5","title":{"rendered":"Various Stuff on the Web"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One can keep track of what is going on in theoretical physics now by taking a look at conference websites. Often after the conference they put up speaker&#8217;s transparencies or even audio or video of the talk.  Some very recent examples:<br \/>\n<A href=\"http:\/\/mitchell.physics.tamu.edu\/Conference\/Cosmology04\/main.html\"><br \/>\nStrings and Cosmology <\/A><\/p>\n<p>a conference last week at Texas A and M, and<br \/>\n<A href=\"http:\/\/agenda.ictp.trieste.it\/agenda\/current\/fullAgenda.php?ida=a0339\"><br \/>\nSpring School on Superstring Theory and Related Topics <\/A><\/p>\n<p>at the ICTP in Trieste.  Among the Trieste lectures, Marcos Marino&#8217;s notes give a nice discussion of some things you can do with topological strings. Brandenberger&#8217;s notes on &#8220;Challenges in String Cosmology&#8221; include the peculiar statement that &#8220;String cosmology does not exist because non-perturbative string theory is not yet known&#8221;.  That was my impression too, but this doesn&#8217;t really explain why he is lecturing on a subject that doesn&#8217;t exist or why people devote many conferences to it.<\/p>\n<p>Among the new papers appearing at the arXiv is Witten&#8217;s latest:<br \/>\n<A href=\"http:\/\/www.arxiv.org\/abs\/hep-th\/0403199\"> Parity Invariance for Strings in Twistor Space <\/A><\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m still kind of not seeing why Witten and others are so interested in this.  Using strings as a dual to QCD to understand its strong coupling behavior is obviously interesting, but why is reformulating something you understand well (perturbative Yang-Mills) in terms of strings in a super-version of twistor space so interesting?  The interesting thing about twistors always seemed to me that they were naturally parity asymmetric,  one chirality of spinors is tautologically defined.  Witten&#8217;s latest paper seems to just be showing how to get rid of this natural chiral asymmetry in this case.<\/p>\n<p>Another new paper is:<br \/>\n<A href=\"http:\/\/www.arxiv.org\/abs\/hep-th\/0403211\"><br \/>\nThe Emergence of Anticommuting Coordinates and the Dirac-Ramond-Kostant operators <\/A><\/p>\n<p>by Lars Brink.  The  Kostant version of the Dirac operator is pretty amazing and too little known, both among mathematicians and physicists.  I&#8217;m not so sure what Brink is trying to do with it leads anywhere, but there are other applications of it I&#8217;ll try and write about some day.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One can keep track of what is going on in theoretical physics now by taking a look at conference websites. Often after the conference they put up speaker&#8217;s transparencies or even audio or video of the talk. Some very recent &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=5\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}