{"id":495,"date":"2006-11-25T14:30:48","date_gmt":"2006-11-25T19:30:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=495"},"modified":"2007-02-20T13:54:24","modified_gmt":"2007-02-20T18:54:24","slug":"media-and-other-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=495","title":{"rendered":"Media and Other News"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There&#8217;s filming going on outside my office window today, right at the entrance to the Columbia Mathematics building. The film is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0790627\/\">Brief Interviews With Hideous Men<\/a>, with a screenplay based on the David Foster Wallace book of the same name.<\/p>\n<p>On the way in here I stopped at a bookstore and took a look at the new Thomas Pynchon novel <em>Against the Day<\/em>. Over at Cosmic Variance, <a href=\"http:\/\/cosmicvariance.com\/2006\/11\/20\/the-perfect-literary-storm\/\">Mark Trodden<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/cosmicvariance.com\/2006\/07\/20\/untitled-thomas-pynchon\/\">Sean Carroll<\/a> are Pynchon fans and have postings about this. I was quite fond of <em>Vineland<\/em> and enjoyed some of Pynchon&#8217;s earlier books, but he lost me with <em>Mason and Dixon<\/em>, and this new one doesn&#8217;t look promising. From flipping through it, one important topic seems to be quaternions and their relation to 4d space-time geometry, and a group of characters are called the Quaternioneers. I almost bought the book, thinking that it was my duty as a chronicler of the nexus of math, physics and popular culture to read the thing. But when I picked it up, its sheer heft caused an immediate feeling of discouragement, so I put it back down and will wait for reports from others.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s a new movie out this week called <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0453467\/\">Deja Vu<\/a>, and evidently string theory play a significant role in its time-travel\/multiverse based plot. My colleague Brian Greene was scientific consultant on the film, and the Cosmic Log MSNBC blog has a <a href=\"http:\/\/cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com\/archive\/2006\/11\/24\/15629.aspx\">story<\/a> about this, noting that he&#8217;s also involved in another time-travel movie project (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0768212\/\">Mimzy<\/a>), and appeared in yet a third (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0186151\/\">Frequency<\/a>). The MSNBC story does explain that time-travel is not a big topic of current physics research, but describes physicists as &#8220;intrigued by the trippy concepts spawned by string theory &#8211; indicating that the universe could follow any of 10<sup>500<\/sup> possible courses, and that our course seems to be going down just the right path to allow for the development of stars, galaxies and life&#8221; (the story does note that some people have a problem with this and gives &#8220;Not Even Wrong&#8221; a mention). While I gave up on the idea of spending $35 on the Pynchon book and devoting endless hours to reading its more than 1100 pages, spending $10 and devoting a couple hours to watching a cheesy movie seems like a much more viable way of fulfilling my blogger duties, so I think I&#8217;ll be doing that this evening.<\/p>\n<p>Continuing on the science fiction theme, next year&#8217;s Les Houches summer school will be on the topic <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lpthe.jussieu.fr\/houches07\/\">String Theory and the Real World<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>In further media news, last week I talked with someone from the CBC radio program The Current, and supposedly they were going to use some of this in a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbc.ca\/thecurrent\/2006\/200611\/20061124.html\">program<\/a> on the controversy over string theory that aired yesterday. Also someone tells me that this past week&#8217;s issue of Der Spiegel has an article on this.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, for some non-media science fact, the week before last there was a workshop in Paris on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lpthe.jussieu.fr\/~kbenakli\/LHCEra_fichiers\/Preliminary%20Program3.htm\">High Energy Physics in the LHC Era<\/a>. There were quite a few interesting talks, including one by Albert de Roeck on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lpthe.jussieu.fr\/~kbenakli\/LHCEra_fichiers\/slides\/deroeck.pdf\">post LHC accelerator possiblities<\/a> (mainly the SLHC, a luminosity upgrade of the LHC), by Alessandro Strumia on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lpthe.jussieu.fr\/~kbenakli\/LHCEra_fichiers\/slides\/strumia.pdf\">astrophysical neutrino experiments<\/a>, and by Fabio Zwirner on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lpthe.jussieu.fr\/~kbenakli\/LHCEra_fichiers\/slides\/zwirner.pdf\">supersymmetry<\/a> (see page 18 of his slides for a good reason not to believe in supersymmetry). The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lpthe.jussieu.fr\/~kbenakli\/LHCEra_fichiers\/slides\/maiani.pdf\">summary talk<\/a> was given by Luciano Maiani, who argued that the next machine after the LHC should be a larger proton-proton machine, on the SSC size scale, to be built in the US (since it wouldn&#8217;t even fit at CERN), with an electron-positron collider to be built at CERN.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Update<\/strong>:  For a more general discussion of the question of whether new physics that solves the naturalness problem will be visible at the LHC, see a recent <a href=\"http:\/\/dorigo.wordpress.com\/2006\/11\/25\/fine-tuning-and-new-physics-at-the-lhc\/\">posting<\/a> by Tommaso Dorigo, who is reporting on a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bo.infn.it\/Atlas-Cms2006\/index_files\/programma.html\">conference<\/a> going on in Bologna, especially the talk by Andrea Romanino.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Update<\/strong>: The movie is completely generic, including no strings, but just a standard-issue wormhole.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There&#8217;s filming going on outside my office window today, right at the entrance to the Columbia Mathematics building. The film is Brief Interviews With Hideous Men, with a screenplay based on the David Foster Wallace book of the same name. &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=495\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-495","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/495","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=495"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/495\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=495"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=495"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=495"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}