{"id":471,"date":"2006-10-06T15:01:27","date_gmt":"2006-10-06T19:01:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=471"},"modified":"2006-11-21T11:58:51","modified_gmt":"2006-11-21T16:58:51","slug":"schroers-samisdat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=471","title":{"rendered":"Schroer&#8217;s &#8220;Samizdat&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bert Schroer has a new version of his paper that was discussed here earlier this year, now with the amended title <a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/physics\/0603112v4\">String theory and the crisis in particle physics (a Samizdat on particle physics)<\/a>.  He claims that the version reflects a change in viewpoint due to his participation in this and other weblogs, and I believe he would like the opportunity to discuss this further here.  There&#8217;s also a <a href=\"http:\/\/fysix.blogspot.com\/2006\/10\/zeitgeist-string-era.html\">posting<\/a> about this at the weblog of Risto Raitio.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Update<\/strong>:  Schroer, agreeing with his critics that his paper had too many typos, has sent me a corrected version, which is available  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/schroer.pdf\">here<\/a>, for use until the arXiv version gets updated.  He also agrees that an &#8220;s&#8221; should be a &#8220;z&#8221; in Samizdat&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Update<\/strong>: Schroer has a <a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/hep-th\/0610225\">new paper<\/a> out, which contains a review of AQFT and a discussion of light-front holography, with further comments on the relation to the Maldacena conjecture.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bert Schroer has a new version of his paper that was discussed here earlier this year, now with the amended title String theory and the crisis in particle physics (a Samizdat on particle physics). He claims that the version reflects &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=471\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-471","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/471","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=471"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/471\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=471"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=471"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=471"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}