{"id":3525,"date":"2011-03-23T14:36:04","date_gmt":"2011-03-23T18:36:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=3525"},"modified":"2011-03-29T11:10:01","modified_gmt":"2011-03-29T15:10:01","slug":"things-that-deserve-but-wont-get-longer-blog-postings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=3525","title":{"rendered":"Things That Deserve (but won&#8217;t get) Longer Blog Postings"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here&#8217;s a selection of news that deserves longer blog postings that, for one reason or another, I&#8217;m unable or unwilling to provide&#8230;<\/p>\n<li>This year&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.abelprisen.no\/en\/prisvinnere\/2011\/\">Abel Prize<\/a> goes to John Milnor.  With an <a href=\"http:\/\/gowers.wordpress.com\/2011\/03\/23\/milnor-wins-2011-abel-prize\/\">excellent blog posting<\/a> about this from Fields Medalist Tim Gowers, why should I try and compete?<\/li>\n<li>I&#8217;ve been waiting for the US budget situation to clarify before writing about its implications for physics and math research, but it looks like that isn&#8217;t going to happen anytime soon.  The US Congress is now engaged in a bizarre and irresponsible exercise of trying to run the country by each week fighting over not next year&#8217;s budget, not next quarter&#8217;s, not next month&#8217;s, but next week&#8217;s. At the moment there&#8217;s a budget for the next week and a half, but no one seems to know what will happen after this.  The president has issued a proposed FY2012 budget, but there&#8217;s no reason to believe it will have anything to do with whatever the reality of funding later this year turns out to be.  Trying to make plans and run a large laboratory like Fermilab under these conditions must be a nightmare.   Last week there was a HEPAP meeting in Washington, with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.science.doe.gov\/hep\/agendas\/HEPAPAgendaMarch2011.shtml\">presentations<\/a> that explain the current situation.  A good excuse for not writing more about the future implications of federal funding decisions is that no one is actually making such decisions.<\/li>\n<li>Last week Langlands supposedly gave a talk at the IAS, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.math.ias.edu\/seminars\/abstract?event=40496\">On Functoriality; on the Correspondence; and on Their Relation, Part I<\/a> (I&#8217;m not sure if or when there will be a Part II).  I wasn&#8217;t able to attend, but perhaps video will someday be available.  Langlands provides a link to a document of &#8220;work in progress&#8221; entitled <a href=\"http:\/\/publications.ias.edu\/rpl\/paper\/452\">Functoriality and Reciprocity<\/a>.  In it, he gives his reflections on the current state of attempts to precisely formulate and understand the conjectures generally referred to as &#8220;Langlands functoriality&#8221; and the &#8220;Langlands Correspondence&#8221; (or &#8220;Langlands reciprocity&#8221;).  These conjectures come in versions for algebraic number fields, function fields, and so-called &#8220;geometric Langlands&#8221; over the complex numbers, in each case in local and global versions.\n<p>Much of the document consists of Langland&#8217;s description of his struggle to understand some issues in the geometric Langlands story, including the work of Witten and collaborators relating this to 4 and 6d quantum field theories.   Another topic is that of the Abelian theory, and attempts to understand it locally.  A very good reason to not write more about this is that I don&#8217;t understand it very well, although, paradoxically, I find Langlands writing about what confuses him rather easier to follow than when he writes about what he has completely understood.  Another good reason is that I&#8217;m busily learning more about some of this, and maybe someday I&#8217;ll be less confused and able to write something more sensible here.<\/li>\n<li>Also from the IAS, there&#8217;s video of a talk by Arkani-Hamed to the mathematicians available <a href=\"http:\/\/video.ias.edu\/topology\/nima\">here<\/a>, about work on scattering amplitudes. I&#8217;m curious to know what they made of it.<\/li>\n<li>Also on the Langlands front, again in a category of things I don&#8217;t understand well enough to write more about, see this new <a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1103.4066\">Seminaire Bourbaki report on the Fundamental Lemma<\/a> from Thomas Hales.<\/li>\n<p><strong>Update<\/strong>:  There&#8217;s a Newsday story about Milnor <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newsday.com\/long-island\/suffolk\/stony-brook-prof-wins-prestigious-award-1.2780151\">here<\/a>, unfortunately only the first bit is free.  He explains what he is going to do with the million bucks: buy more leg-room on airplane flights (he&#8217;s 6&#8217;3&#8243;).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here&#8217;s a selection of news that deserves longer blog postings that, for one reason or another, I&#8217;m unable or unwilling to provide&#8230; This year&#8217;s Abel Prize goes to John Milnor. With an excellent blog posting about this from Fields Medalist &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=3525\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[9,11,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3525","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-experimental-hep-news","category-langlands","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3525","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3525"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3525\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3531,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3525\/revisions\/3531"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3525"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3525"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3525"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}