{"id":2591,"date":"2009-12-17T16:03:34","date_gmt":"2009-12-17T21:03:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=2591"},"modified":"2009-12-17T16:22:15","modified_gmt":"2009-12-17T21:22:15","slug":"2010-lhc-schedule","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=2591","title":{"rendered":"2010 LHC Schedule"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The LHC shut down yesterday for an end-of-year break after a very successful initial period of beam commissioning at beam energies of 450 GeV and 1.18 TeV.  Tomorrow at CERN there will be public <a href=\"http:\/\/indico.cern.ch\/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=76398\">reports<\/a> about the state of the LHC and the initial results from the experiments. I gather that by now all sorts of particles have been rediscovered, including kaons and lambdas, here are some details from <a href=\"http:\/\/cornellmath.wordpress.com\/2009\/12\/16\/the-particle-body-count\/\">Jim Pivarski<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s now a tentative schedule 2010 out.  Hardware commissioning of the new quench protection system, allowing beam energies up to 3.5 TeV, will begin on January 4, and be completed by February 15. A new checkout to prepare for beam commissioning will take place Feb. 17-19, and next injection of a beam into the LHC should be around February 20.  Commissioning of 3.5 TeV beams and some pilot physics runs at that energy should take a month or so, with the first regular physics runs at 3.5 TeV\/beam beginning around March 25.   A tentative month-long shutdown to reconfigure the machine to run at higher energy (up to 5 TeV\/beam) is scheduled for May 3-June 2.<\/p>\n<p>From January 25-29 machine experts will meet in Chamonix to discuss whether to try and run at 5 TeV\/beam in 2010, and how to implement this if it seems feasible.  Plans will also be made for the late 2010-2011 shutdown.  This will require deciding what to do about all the problematic splices in the machine in order to allow operation at the design energy of 7 TeV\/beam, as well as understanding how much retraining of the dipoles will be needed in order to get to that energy.  Current plans call for a &#8220;long shutdown&#8221; in 2013-4 to begin some upgrades of the LHC, and this is another topic that will be discussed.<\/p>\n<p>While news coverage of the LHC in science magazines like Science News has been a mixed bag, often focussing on extra-dimensional speculation irrelevant to the actual science that will get done there, there&#8217;s a quite good new article <a href=\"http:\/\/www.vanityfair.com\/culture\/features\/2010\/01\/hadron-collider-201001\">here<\/a>, in a surprising location: Vanity Fair.  The LHC has become a real celebrity&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The LHC shut down yesterday for an end-of-year break after a very successful initial period of beam commissioning at beam energies of 450 GeV and 1.18 TeV. Tomorrow at CERN there will be public reports about the state of the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=2591\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2591","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-experimental-hep-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2591","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2591"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2591\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2595,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2591\/revisions\/2595"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2591"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2591"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2591"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}