{"id":2334,"date":"2009-10-02T17:20:32","date_gmt":"2009-10-02T22:20:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=2334"},"modified":"2009-10-02T17:20:32","modified_gmt":"2009-10-02T22:20:32","slug":"bourbaki-archives","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=2334","title":{"rendered":"Bourbaki Archives"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;d recently been wondering whether the archives of the Bourbaki group would be put on-line, and today noticed that there&#8217;s a <a href=\"http:\/\/poincare.univ-nancy2.fr\/Outilsetfonds\/?contentId=1476\">project<\/a> to do so, with results available <a href=\"http:\/\/portail.mathdoc.fr\/archives-bourbaki\/\">here<\/a>.   One can read copies of &#8220;La Tribu&#8221;, internal reports on the activities of the group, up through 1953.   There are a wide variety of interesting mathematical documents, often consisting of attempts to write up one subject or another, efforts that sometimes made it into the published books, often not.<\/p>\n<p>One subject that Bourbaki struggled with over the years was that of how to set out the foundations of differential geometry.  My colleague Herv&eacute; Jacquet likes to tell about how Chevalley at one point made an effort to do so, with the peculiar starting point of defining things in terms of &#8220;cubes&#8221;.   I wasn&#8217;t sure whether to believe him, but <a href=\"http:\/\/portail.mathdoc.fr\/archives-bourbaki\/PDF\/167bis_nbr_068.pdf\">here<\/a> it is.   According to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ams.org\/notices\/199803\/borel.pdf\">Borel<\/a>, in 1957 Grothendieck presented the group with his own take on the question of manifolds:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Grothendieck lost no time and presented to the next Congress, about three months later, two drafts:<\/p>\n<p>Chap. 0: Preliminaries to the book on manifolds. Categories of manifolds, 98 pages<\/p>\n<p>Chap. I: Differentiable manifolds, The differential formalism, 164 pages<\/p>\n<p>and warned that much more algebra would be needed, e.g., hyperalgebras. As was often the case with Grothendieck\u2019s papers, they were at points discouragingly general, but at others rich in ideas and insights. However, it was rather clear that if we followed that route, we would be bogged down with foundations for many years, with a very uncertain outcome.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I don&#8217;t see these documents on the list, perhaps documents from the later years are still to appear.<\/p>\n<p>The documents often start out with some unvarnished comments, here&#8217;s an example, from Chevalley&#8217;s report on a text about semi-simple Lie algebras:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Au moment d&#8217;&eacute;crire ces observations, je me demande si ce ramassis des m&eacute;thodes les plus &eacute;cul&eacute;es et les plus pisseuses, ces r&eacute;sultats les moins g&eacute;n&eacute;raux possibles &eacute;tablis de la mani&egrave;re la plus incompr&eacute;hensible possible, ne sont pas un canular intrabourbachique mont&eacute; par le r&eacute;dacteur.  M&ecirc;me s&#8217;il en est ainsi, je me laisse prendre au canular et pr&eacute;sente les observations suivantes.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;d recently been wondering whether the archives of the Bourbaki group would be put on-line, and today noticed that there&#8217;s a project to do so, with results available here. One can read copies of &#8220;La Tribu&#8221;, internal reports on the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=2334\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2334","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2334","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2334"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2334\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2338,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2334\/revisions\/2338"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2334"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2334"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2334"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}