{"id":213,"date":"2005-06-29T18:37:25","date_gmt":"2005-06-29T22:37:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=213"},"modified":"2005-06-29T18:37:25","modified_gmt":"2005-06-29T22:37:25","slug":"latest-on-poincare","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=213","title":{"rendered":"Latest on Poincare"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The status of Perelman&#8217;s proof of the Poincare conjecture is still somewhat confusing.  For some background see a <A href=\"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/blog\/archives\/000077.html\">previous posting<\/A> and a later <A href=\"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/blog\/archives\/000114.html\">follow-up<\/A>.  Last week the ICTP in Trieste issued a press release entitled <A href=\"http:\/\/news.ictp.it\/index.php?p=91\">Poincare Conjecture Solved<\/A>, which states that Perelman&#8217;s proof &#8220;has been confirmed by an international group of mathematicians whose findings were presented to participants at a conference&#8221; at the ICTP.  The <A href=\"http:\/\/cdsagenda5.ictp.trieste.it\/full_display.php?smr=0&#038;ida=a04195\">conference<\/A> was a summer school, and the press release goes on to claim that &#8220;The 60 participants, more than half from the developing world, reaffirmed the approving judgement of the mathematicians.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>If you look at the write-ups of the talks, the only relevant thing in print is in the <A href=\" http:\/\/agenda.ictp.trieste.it\/agenda\/current\/askArchive.php?base=agenda&#038;categ=a04195&#038;id=a04195s15t5\/lecture_notes\">lecture notes of Carlo Sinestrati<\/A> where he states &#8220;The details of the proof are still being checked by the experts in the field; however, the main ideas of the papers are by now widely understood.&#8221;  So, it&#8217;s not clear who exactly is supposedly now willing to vouch for Perelman&#8217;s proof, and the comment that the students at the school  &#8220;reaffirmed&#8221; that it is a proof is kind of silly, given the difficulties involved.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s a month-long <A href=\"http:\/\/www.claymath.org\/programs\/summer_school\/2005\/program.php\">summer  school<\/A> going on right now at MSRI in Berkeley, sponsored by the Clay Mathematics Institute.  Many relevant materials are available at the web-site of the summer school.  As far as I know, none of the experts there is yet quite willing to claim that a complete proof using Perelman&#8217;s techniques has been written down and checked, although they do seem to be getting close to this point.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The status of Perelman&#8217;s proof of the Poincare conjecture is still somewhat confusing. For some background see a previous posting and a later follow-up. Last week the ICTP in Trieste issued a press release entitled Poincare Conjecture Solved, which states &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=213\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-213","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=213"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=213"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=213"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=213"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}