{"id":194,"date":"2005-05-18T17:02:04","date_gmt":"2005-05-18T21:02:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=194"},"modified":"2005-05-18T17:02:04","modified_gmt":"2005-05-18T21:02:04","slug":"string-theory-and-theology-at-the-aaas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=194","title":{"rendered":"String Theory and Theology at the AAAS"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Someone wrote to me today to tell me that Harvard&#8217;s Nima Arkani-Hamed recently <A href=\"http:\/\/www.wash.org\/eweekly\/WW27APR05.html\">gave a lecture<\/A> in Washington with the title &#8220;String Theory &#8212; Can We Test It?&#8221;.  Somehow, I suspect that his lecture didn&#8217;t really give an honest answer to the question, since it would be hard to fill up an hour-long talk by just saying &#8220;No&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Looking into this more carefully, it turns out that the talk was part of a <A href=\"http:\/\/www.aaas.org\/spp\/dser\/\">&#8220;Dialogue on Science, Ethics and Religion&#8221;<\/A> sponsored by the AAAS.   At first I thought it was unusual to see a &#8220;Science and Religion&#8221; program paid for by anyone but the <A href=\"http:\/\/www.templeton.org\">Templeton Foundation<\/A> (for more about them, see <A href=\"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/blog\/archives\/000179.html\">here<\/A> and <A href=\"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/blog\/archives\/000183.html\">here<\/A>), but it turns out that they are the first organization listed in the <A href=\"http:\/\/www.aaas.org\/spp\/dser\/about\/index.shtml#supportstatement\">list of those providing financial support<\/A> for the program.  I wouldn&#8217;t have guessed that the AAAS was in bed with Templeton and running programs on &#8220;Science and Religion&#8221;, but this kind of thing doesn&#8217;t surprise me anymore.<\/p>\n<p>Arkani-Hamed&#8217;s talk was entitled: <A href=\"http:\/\/www.aaas.org\/spp\/dser\/seminar\/2005\/042805stringtheory.shtml\">Naturalness versus the Superstring Landscape, or, Why Does The Universe Appear Finely Tuned?<\/A> (not sure why it was advertised with the &#8220;String Theory &#8212; Can We Test It?&#8221; title).  The organizer and &#8220;respondent&#8221; was <A href=\"http:\/\/www.aaas.org\/spp\/dser\/seminar\/bios\/millerjim.shtml\">James B. Miller<\/A>, an ordained Presbyterian minister with a Ph. D. in Theology from Marquette University.  From the abstract it appears that the talk involved Arkani-Hamed&#8217;s usual claims that split supersymmetry makes &#8220;sharp experimental predictions&#8221; for what the LHC will see (he seems to have a rather different notion of what an experimental prediction is than most scientists, much less what a &#8220;sharp&#8221; one is).  He also seems to have implied that the superstring landscape scenario predicts split supersymmetry, something that actually isn&#8217;t the case, or at least is only true in the sense that the landscape predicts nothing at all, and thus is consistent with anything.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Someone wrote to me today to tell me that Harvard&#8217;s Nima Arkani-Hamed recently gave a lecture in Washington with the title &#8220;String Theory &#8212; Can We Test It?&#8221;. Somehow, I suspect that his lecture didn&#8217;t really give an honest answer &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=194\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-194","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/194","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=194"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/194\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=194"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=194"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=194"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}