{"id":14034,"date":"2024-07-12T19:01:14","date_gmt":"2024-07-12T23:01:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=14034"},"modified":"2024-11-07T09:15:10","modified_gmt":"2024-11-07T14:15:10","slug":"the-harvard-swampland-initiative","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=14034","title":{"rendered":"The Harvard Swampland Initiative"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The past few years I&#8217;ve been noticing more and more claims like <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/naomigend\/status\/1811473063244104179\">this one<\/a>, supposedly finding a way to &#8220;connect string theory to experiment&#8221;.  When you look into such claims you don&#8217;t find anything at all like a conventional experiment\/theory connection of the usual scientific method, giving testable predictions and a way to move science forward.  As for what you do find, for many years I tried writing about this in detail (see <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?cat=10\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?cat=27\">here<\/a>), but that&#8217;s clearly a waste of time.<\/p>\n<p>One thing that mystifies me about such claims is that I find it very hard to believe that most theorists take them seriously, always assumed that the great majority was with Nima Arkani-Hamed, who <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=13924\">recently<\/a> characterized the track record of this kind of thing as &#8220;really garbage&#8221;.  But if most theorists think this is garbage, why am I seeing more and more of it?  A hint of an answer comes from <a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2407.07143\">the paper with the supposed connection<\/a>, which describes the Harvard Swampland Initiative as the place the work initiated.<\/p>\n<p>I hadn&#8217;t been aware there was a <a href=\"https:\/\/swampland-initiative.physics.harvard.edu\/\">Harvard Swampland Initiative<\/a>, but it is a Research Center at Harvard, running an &#8220;immersive program&#8221; in which &#8220;participants collectively navigate the Swampland&#8221;.  More importantly, it has no less than ten associated postdoc positions.  On the scale of different ways of having influence on a field, being able to hand out ten postdoc positions at Harvard is right up there.  This goes a long way towards explaining to me what I&#8217;ve been seeing in recent years. It also makes me quite depressed: when I started my career in that department in the late seventies, the idea that fifty years later this is what it would come to is something beyond any one&#8217;s worst nightmare at the time.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Update:<\/strong> In case anyone has any doubt about what the main goal of the Swampland program is, see <a href=\"https:\/\/phys.org\/news\/2024-05-quantum-theory-gravitation-effective-field.html\">here<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nRecently, physicists have started a new program called Swampland to overcome the criticism of string theory that arose in the 2000s. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;Recently&#8221; seems to refer to  2005, when this started.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The past few years I&#8217;ve been noticing more and more claims like this one, supposedly finding a way to &#8220;connect string theory to experiment&#8221;. When you look into such claims you don&#8217;t find anything at all like a conventional experiment\/theory &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=14034\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14034","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-swampland"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14034","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14034"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14034\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14039,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14034\/revisions\/14039"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14034"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14034"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14034"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}