{"id":825,"date":"2010-09-07T18:25:52","date_gmt":"2010-09-07T18:25:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=825"},"modified":"2010-09-07T19:32:31","modified_gmt":"2010-09-07T19:32:31","slug":"bands","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=825","title":{"rendered":"Bands"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I think there is some confusion in the literature about what a band is, although likely this is just me. I just googled a bit and found, I think, at least two inequivalent definitions. I have also had at least one very confusing conversation with somebody (can&#8217;t remember whom), which I now think is due to us having different definitions. For the stacks project, I would prefer the band of a gerbe to be the finest possible invariant of the gerbe. I think this basically tells us what to do. Please don&#8217;t read the rest of this post if you already know how to do this.<\/p>\n<p>First, let us make the following basic observation (and you are going to laugh at me for even pointing this out). For an element g of a group G let inn_g : G &#8212;> G be the map x |&#8212;> gxg^{-1}. Suppose that G, H are groups and that a, b : G &#8212;> H are homomorphisms of groups. Then the following are equivalent<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>there exists an element h of H such that a = inn_h o b,<\/li>\n<li>there exist elements g of G and h of H such that a = inn_h o b o inn_g.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The reason is that b o inn_g = inn_{b(g)} o b and that inn_{hh&#8217;} = inn_h o inn_{h&#8217;}. If the equivalent conditions hold we say that a, b define the same <em>outer homomorphism<\/em> from G to H. You can compose outer homomorphisms because if you have a : G &#8212;> H and b : H &#8212;> F and g, h, h&#8217;, f in G, H, H, F, then we have (inn_f o b o inn_{h&#8217;}) o (inn_h o a o inn_g) = inn_{fb(h&#8217;)b(h)b(a(g))} o b o a. OK, so this gives us the category of <em>exterior groups<\/em>, sometimes called the category of <em>outer groups<\/em>. An automorphism in the category of exterior groups is often called an outer automorphism. It is clear how to generalize this to sheaves of groups over a site (you have to localize to get the correct notion of an outer homomorphism of sheaves of groups).<\/p>\n<p>Let C be a site. Consider the fibred category <em>PreBands<\/em> over C whose category of sections over an object U is the category of exterior sheaves of groups over U, so objects are sheaves of groups on U and morphisms are outer homomorphisms. Stackify <em>PreBands<\/em> to get the stack of bands <em>Bands<\/em> over C. A <em>band<\/em> is then an object of the fibre category of  <em>Bands<\/em> over a final object of C (and slightly more complicated if C does not have a final object).<\/p>\n<p>What does such a band B look like? Let X be a final object of C. Then B is given by a system ({X_i &#8212;&gt; X}, G_i, \u03c6_{ij}) where {X_i &#8212;&gt; X} is a covering, each G_i sheaf of groups on X_i, each \u03c6_{ij} is an outer isomorphism of G_i|_{X_i \\times_X X_j} &#8212;&gt; G_j|_{X_i \\times_X X_j} satisfying a cocycle condition. To get morphisms of bands ({X_i &#8212;&gt; X}, G_i, \u03c6_{ii&#8217;}) &#8212;&gt; ({Y_j &#8212;&gt; X}, H_j, \u03c8_{jj&#8217;}) consider the following two kinds of morphisms of systems<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li> one given by a refinement of coverings {Y_j &#8212;&gt; X} &#8212;&gt; {X_i &#8212;&gt; X} (note reversal arrow) where the H_j are the pullbacks of the G_i, and<\/li>\n<li>one of the form ({X_i &#8212;&gt; X}, G_i, \u03c6_{ii&#8217;}) &#8212;&gt; ({X_i &#8212;&gt; X}, H_i, \u03c8_{ii&#8217;}) given by outer homomorphisms of sheaves of groups G_i &#8212;&gt; H_i compatible with \u03c6_{ii&#8217;} and \u03c8_{ii&#8217;}.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Then (roughly) you have to invert the ones of the first kind and the ones of the second kind where all the G_i &#8212;> H_i are outer isomorphisms to get morphisms of bands.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, given a gerbe \\cX over C we get a band B(\\cX) by choosing a covering {X_i &#8212;&gt; X} and objects x_i over the members of the covering in \\cX. The associated band is ({X_i &#8212;&gt; X}, Aut(x_i), \u03c6_{ii&#8217;}), where the outer isomorphisms \u03c6_{ij} come from the existence of local isomorphisms between the pullbacks of x_i and x_j over X_i \\times_X X_j. This band is well defined up to unique isomorphism of bands.<\/p>\n<p>Then, given a fixed band B, we say that a gerb \\cX is <em>banded by<\/em> B if there exists a isomorphism &theta;: B &#8212;> B(\\cX) to the band associated to the gerbe \\cX. But be careful: If we try to classify all gerbes banded by B we could mean either of the following two things: Classify pairs (\\cX, &theta;) or classify \\cX&#8217;s such that a &theta; exists!<\/p>\n<p>[Edit: I stole this description of bands from the paper by Max Lieblich and Brian Osserman, see <a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/0807.4562\">arXiv:0807.4562<\/a>. Unfortunately, there is a typo in their description of outer morphisms, they divide out by Aut(G) and Aut(H) but the should have used Inn(G) and Inn(H).]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I think there is some confusion in the literature about what a band is, although likely this is just me. I just googled a bit and found, I think, at least two inequivalent definitions. I have also had at least &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=825\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-825","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/825","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=825"}],"version-history":[{"count":23,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/825\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":847,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/825\/revisions\/847"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=825"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=825"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=825"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}