{"id":511,"date":"2010-06-10T15:30:01","date_gmt":"2010-06-10T15:30:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=511"},"modified":"2010-06-10T15:30:01","modified_gmt":"2010-06-10T15:30:01","slug":"final-bootstrap","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=511","title":{"rendered":"Final bootstrap"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The following results now have a complete proof in the stacks project:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>If F = U\/R where R is an equivalence relation on U such that R &#8212;&gt; U are flat and locally of finite presentation then F is an algebraic space.<\/li>\n<li>If F is a sheaf such that there exists U &#8212;&gt; F which is representable by algebraic spaces, surjective, flat, and locally of finite presentation, then F is an algebraic space.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>See <a href=\"http:\/\/math.columbia.edu\/algebraic_geometry\/stacks-git\/locate.php?tag=045H\">Theorem Tag 04S6<\/a>. This is the culmination of a lot of hard work and I am very happy that it is finally done!<\/p>\n<p>The original reason for adding this to the stacks project was that I wanted to start writing about presentations of algebraic stacks. This immediately leads to the following two questions:<\/p>\n<ol type=\"a\">\n<li>Suppose that X is an algebraic stack with trivial inertia. Why is X an algebraic space?<\/li>\n<li>Suppose that (U, R, s, t, c) is a groupoid in algebraic spaces with s, t smooth. Why is the associated stack in groupoids [U\/R] on (Sch\/S)_{fppf} is an algebraic stack?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>I would like to stress that both questions are nontrivial. Let me discuss why.<\/p>\n<p>Part (a) is a bit easier if X is a Deligne-Mumford stack, see <a href=\"http:\/\/math.columbia.edu\/algebraic_geometry\/stacks-git\/locate.php?tag=045H\">Lemma Tag 045H<\/a> although it already uses a bootstrap argument for the diagonal. In the general case, besides bootstrapping the diagonal, you have to show that starting with a smooth equivalence relation you can get an etale equivalence relation with the same quotient sheaf. You can try to prove this by carefully slicing, which probably works, although it isn&#8217;t that easy (one problem is that you don&#8217;t know a priori which points to slice at even if everything is of finite type over a Noetherian base). Our approach is to see (a) as a direct consequence of (1) since after all a smooth morphism is flat and locally of finite presentation. Thus our proof of (a) completely takes one outside the realm of smooth presentations.<\/p>\n<p>Part (b), besides a lot of general nonsense which already is documented in the stacks project, requires proving that the Isom sheaves of [U\/R] are representable by algebraic spaces. This is relatively straightforward if you take the associated stack in the etale topology: you have to show a sheaf over a base scheme S which etale locally on S becomes an algebraic space is an algebraic space. But in the stacks project we use the fppf topology and it is not so straightforward: you have to show a sheaf over S which fppf locally on S becomes an algebraic space is an algebraic space. Although I haven&#8217;t written out all the details, I think this is a simple consequence of (2) above.<\/p>\n<p>In the future we will need to discuss another theorem similar to the results above. Namely, Artin&#8217;s result that if (U, R, s, t, c) is a groupoid in algebraic spaces and s, t are flat and locally of finite presentation then the associated stack [U\/R] is algebraic. The results above tell us that the only thing we need to do is show there exists a scheme and a surjective smooth morphism from that scheme onto [U\/R], i.e., all the other properties have already been taken care of. To do this we will use Artin&#8217;s trick of looking at complete intersections in fibres of U &#8212;> [U\/R]. But that will be another day!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The following results now have a complete proof in the stacks project: If F = U\/R where R is an equivalence relation on U such that R &#8212;&gt; U are flat and locally of finite presentation then F is an &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=511\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-511","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/511","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=511"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/511\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":529,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/511\/revisions\/529"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=511"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=511"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=511"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}