{"id":4986,"date":"2025-09-28T14:37:22","date_gmt":"2025-09-28T14:37:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=4986"},"modified":"2025-09-28T14:37:22","modified_gmt":"2025-09-28T14:37:22","slug":"de-rham-cohomology-of-an-artinian-ring","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=4986","title":{"rendered":"de Rham cohomology of an Artinian ring"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I wanted to just present an explicit example of a nonvanishing higher de Rham cohomology group of the spectrum of an Artinian finite dimensional C-algebra.<\/p>\n<p>Consider an element f of C[x, y] where C is the complex numbers. Let &omega; be a 1-form in x, y such that<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>d(&omega;) = f d(x) &wedge; d(y)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Such a form always exists by the Poincare lemma for C[x, y]. The form &omega; will give a nonzero cohomology class in the de Rham complex of A = C[x, y]\/(f) unless we can write<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&omega; = d(h) + gd(f) + f &eta;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>for some h, g in C[x,y] and 1 form &eta;. Taking d of this relation we find that one needs to have a g and &eta; such that<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>f d(x) &wedge; d(y) = d(g) &wedge; d(f) + f d(&eta;) + d(f) &wedge; &eta;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This means that with &theta; = &eta; &#8211; d(g) we have<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>f d(x) &wedge; d(y) = f d(&theta;) + d(f) &wedge; &theta; = d(f&theta;)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>If we write &theta; = a d(x) + b d(y) then this gives<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>(*) f = &#8211; &part;(fa)\/&part; y + &part;(fb)\/&part; x<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Now we consider an example due to Reiffen. It is carefully written out in the second appendix of <a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2505.03978\">2505.03978<\/a> that (*) doesn&#8217;t have a solution if f = x^4 + y^5 + x y^4 (see proof of B.8). In fact, the proof shows that there cannot even be a, b in C[x, y] such that (*) holds modulo the maximal ideal (x, y) to the power 6.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Artinian Example.<\/strong> Let B = C[x, y]\/(x^4 + y^5 + x y^4, x^100, y^100). Then the de Rham complex &Omega;^*_{B\/C} has cohomology in degree 1. Namely, take the form &omega; above. If it maps to zero in H^1(&Omega;^*_{B\/C}) then the reader goes through the arguments above and shows that one gets a solution to (*) modulo (x, y)^6 which is a contradiction.<\/p>\n<p>I would welcome a reference for examples of this type (please email me; I will edit the post and put it here). We already have some references to related material in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=4946\">Infinite dimensional de Rham cohomology<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Enjoy!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I wanted to just present an explicit example of a nonvanishing higher de Rham cohomology group of the spectrum of an Artinian finite dimensional C-algebra. Consider an element f of C[x, y] where C is the complex numbers. Let &omega; &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=4986\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4986","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4986","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4986"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4986\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5006,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4986\/revisions\/5006"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4986"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4986"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4986"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}