{"id":4606,"date":"2021-04-18T05:18:27","date_gmt":"2021-04-18T05:18:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=4606"},"modified":"2021-04-18T05:18:27","modified_gmt":"2021-04-18T05:18:27","slug":"annihilating-ext-part-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=4606","title":{"rendered":"Annihilating Ext, part 1"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This blog post will be used in a later one. Please skip ahead to the next one.<\/p>\n<p>Let f_1, &#8230;, f_c be elements of a ring R. We view the Koszul algebra B = K(R, f_1, &#8230;, f_c) as a differential graded R-algebra sitting in cohomological degrees -c, &#8230;, 0. So we have R = B^0 and B^{-1} is free over R with a basis x_1, &#8230;, x_c such that d(x_i) = f_i.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, if f_1, &#8230;, f_c is a regular sequence, then B &#8212;> R\/(f_1, &#8230;, f_c) is a quasi-isomorphism. But we are interested in the general case too.<\/p>\n<p>Denote i_* : D(B) &#8212;> D(R) the pushforward and denote i* : D(R) &#8212;> D(B) the pullback. Let M be an object of D(B). We have a counit map<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>e : i*i_*M &#8212;> M<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>We want to find an element z in R such that for <strong>every<\/strong> M in D(B) there is a map s : M &#8212;> i*i_*M whose composition with e is multiplication by z on M. In other words, we want to split e up to multiplication by z.<\/p>\n<p>Example: suppose that f_1, &#8230;, f_r is a regular sequence and that the map R &#8212;> R\/(f_1, &#8230;, f_r) has a section. Then R &#8212;> B has a section too and we get what we want with z = 1.<\/p>\n<p>Let M be a (right) dg module over B which is free as a graded module. Any dg module over B is quasi-isomorphic to one of these, so there is no loss of generality. The map e is the map<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>multiplication : M &otimes; B &#8212;> M<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>where the tensor product is over R. We are going to construct a map s : M &#8212;> M &otimes; B using derivations. Before we continue, observe that we do have a map of dg B-modules<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&xi; : M &#8212;> (M &otimes; B)[-c]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Namely, we can send m in M to<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>(sign)m &otimes; 1 (x_1 &otimes; 1 &#8211; 1 &otimes; x_1) &#8230; (x_c &otimes; 1 &#8211; 1 &otimes; x_c)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>where the sign is (-1) to the power cdeg(m). The reason this works is that x_i &otimes; 1 &#8211; 1 &otimes; x_i is killed by the differential. There are some sign rules for the multiplication on B &otimes; B: we have (x_i &otimes; 1)(1 &otimes; x_j) = x_i &otimes; x_j and we have (1 &otimes; x_j)(x_i &otimes; 1) = &#8211; x_i &otimes; x_j.<\/p>\n<p>Let D : R &#8212;> R be a derivation. Then we can extend D to a degree zero map D&#8217; : B &#8212;> B which satisfies the Leibniz rule by setting D'(x_i) = 0. Of course D&#8217; does not commute with d in general.<\/p>\n<p>Suppose that M is a (right) dg module over B which is free as a graded module. (Any dg module over B is quasi-isomorphic to one of these.)  Then we can similarly find a degree zero map D&#8217; : M &#8212;> M which satisfies the Leibniz rule over D&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>In both cases consider the map &theta; : B &#8212;> B and &theta; : M &#8212;> M defined by the formula &#038;theta = D&#8217; o d &#8211; d o D&#8217;. Then &theta; has degree 1, defines a map B &#8212;> B[1] and M &#8212;> M[1] of complexes, &theta; : B &#8212;> B is a derivation, and &theta; : M &#8212;> M satisfies the Leibniz rule &theta;(mb) = &theta;(m)b + (sign) m &theta;(b) where the sign is (-1) to the power the degree of m.<\/p>\n<p>A simple calculation shows that &theta;(x_i) = D(f_i).<\/p>\n<p>Next, suppose we have c derivations D_1, &#8230;, D_c. Then we get c maps &theta;_1, &#8230;, &theta;_c : M &#8212;> M[1]. Then we can consider the composition<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>M &#8212; &xi; &#8211;> (M &otimes; B)[-c] &#8212; &theta;_1 &#8230; &theta;_c &otimes; 1 &#8211;> M &otimes; B <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Unless I made a calculation error (which is very possible) the composition of these maps with the map e : M &otimes; B &#8212;> M is equal to multiplication by<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> z = det(D_i(f_j)) <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Thus we conclude what we want with z as above.<\/p>\n<p>The conclusion of this is a precise version of something we all already know: if we have a closed embedding i of codimension c and we have c tangent fields spanning the normal bundle, then we can split the counit map i*i_*M &#8212;> M using those tangent fields.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This blog post will be used in a later one. Please skip ahead to the next one. Let f_1, &#8230;, f_c be elements of a ring R. We view the Koszul algebra B = K(R, f_1, &#8230;, f_c) as a &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=4606\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4606","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4606","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4606"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4606\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4624,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4606\/revisions\/4624"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4606"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4606"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4606"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}