{"id":42,"date":"2010-01-29T15:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-29T15:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=42"},"modified":"2010-01-29T15:16:33","modified_gmt":"2010-01-29T15:16:33","slug":"artins-trick","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=42","title":{"rendered":"Artin&#8217;s trick"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In <a href=\"http:\/\/math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=28\">this post<\/a> I mentioned a theorem usually attributed to Michael Artin which basically says that an fppf sheaf which has a flat, finitely presented cover by a scheme is an algebraic space. I am still working on adding this to the stacks project, and more or less all the preliminary work is done.<\/p>\n<p>But what I wanted to say here is that to prove this one does not have to use &#8220;Artin&#8217;s trick&#8221;. What I mean is the argument in Artin&#8217;s versal deformations paper that rests on the following fact: Given a morphism f : X &#8211;&gt; Y which is flat and of finite presentation then the space H_n(X\/Y) of length n complete intersections in fibers of f is smooth over Y, and moreover \\coprod_n H_n(X\/Y) &#8211;&gt; Y is surjective.<\/p>\n<p>Instead one can use a slicing argument to go down to relative dimension zero (see <a href=\"http:\/\/math.columbia.edu\/algebraic_geometry\/stacks-git\/locate.php?tag=0461\">Lemma Tag 0461<\/a>) and etale localization of groupoids (see <a href=\"http:\/\/math.columbia.edu\/algebraic_geometry\/stacks-git\/locate.php?tag=03FM\">Lemma Tag 03FM<\/a>) to get an etale covering by a scheme (by dividing out by the P-part of the groupoid scheme). Note that the last lemma is a version of Keel-Mori, Proposition 4.2 and that they in their proof use some form of Hilbert schemes also&#8230; but they needn&#8217;t have and standard etale locailzation techniques would have sufficed.<\/p>\n<p>Morally speaking it is clear that Hilbert schemes needn&#8217;t be considered when proving this result since the original flat finitely presented covering X &#8211;&gt; Y might have had relative dimension zero with connected fibres, and then only one H_n(X\/Y) is nonempty (locally on Y), namely that one where n is the relative degree and H_n(X\/Y) = Y. In other words you are just directly proving that Y is an algebraic space!<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, as Jarod Alper pointed out, when we try to prove the analogous result for algebraic stacks, then we have to construct a smooth cover which will have in general a positive relative dimension over the stack and the remark in the preceding paragraph doesn&#8217;t apply. Of course this was the point of Artin&#8217;s trick and this is how he used it in his paper.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In this post I mentioned a theorem usually attributed to Michael Artin which basically says that an fppf sheaf which has a flat, finitely presented cover by a scheme is an algebraic space. I am still working on adding this &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=42\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=42"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":49,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42\/revisions\/49"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=42"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=42"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=42"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}