{"id":4133,"date":"2016-06-29T21:32:35","date_gmt":"2016-06-29T21:32:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=4133"},"modified":"2016-06-30T13:04:12","modified_gmt":"2016-06-30T13:04:12","slug":"limit-preserving-and-finite-presentation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=4133","title":{"rendered":"Limit preserving and finite presentation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Let A &#8212;> B be a ring map. Let R = colim R_i be a filtered colimit of A-algebras. Then there is a canonical map<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>colim Hom_A(B, R_i) &#8212;&#8212;> Hom_A(B, R)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>By <a href=\"http:\/\/stacks.math.columbia.edu\/tag\/00QO\">Tag 00QO<\/a> the following are equivalent<\/p>\n<p>  1. A &#8212;> B is of finite presentation,<br \/>\n  2. the map above is bijective for all R = colim R_i<br \/>\n  3. the map above is surjective for all R = colim R_i<\/p>\n<p>Let S be a scheme. Let X be a scheme over S. Let T = lim T_i be a directed limit of affine schemes over S. Then there is a canonical map<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>colim Mor_S(T_i, X) &#8212;&#8212;> Mor_S(T, X)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>By <a href=\"http:\/\/stacks.math.columbia.edu\/tag\/01ZC\">Tag 01ZC<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/stacks.math.columbia.edu\/tag\/0CM0\">Tag 0CM0<\/a> the following are equivalent<\/p>\n<p>  1. X &#8212;> S is locally of finite presentation,<br \/>\n  2. the map above is bijective for all T = lim T_i<br \/>\n  3. the map above is surjective for all T = lim T_i<\/p>\n<p>The same thing is true if X and S are algebraic spaces (<a href=\"http:\/\/stacks.math.columbia.edu\/tag\/04AK\">Tag 04AK<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/stacks.math.columbia.edu\/tag\/0CM6\">Tag 0CM6<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>I didn&#8217;t know you could replace bijectivity by surjectivity in the criterion. But somewhere in the Stacks project we used this fact without proof, so it had better be true, right?<\/p>\n<p>A related result is that to check a morphism f of algebraic stacks is locally of finite presentation, you need only check f is limit preserving on objects (this is the analogue of the above and it says that certain functors are essentially surjective). You can find this in <a href=\"http:\/\/stacks.math.columbia.edu\/tag\/0CMQ\">Tag 0CMQ<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Caveat: as this only applies to situations where you already know your functors (or stacks in groupoids) are algebraic spaces (or stacks), it probably won&#8217;t be that useful. Often when we try to show a stack is limit preserving, it is part of applying Artin&#8217;s criteria and then we don&#8217;t yet know our stack is algebraic of course.<\/p>\n<p>Thanks for reading!<\/p>\n<p>[Edit on 6\/30\/2016: Matthew Emerton just pointed out that this observation was already in <a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1506.06146\">Lemma 2.3.15 of his paper with Toby Gee<\/a>. I must have read it and then forgotten that I had. Apologies to everybody.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Let A &#8212;> B be a ring map. Let R = colim R_i be a filtered colimit of A-algebras. Then there is a canonical map colim Hom_A(B, R_i) &#8212;&#8212;> Hom_A(B, R) By Tag 00QO the following are equivalent 1. A &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=4133\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4133","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4133","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4133"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4133\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4141,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4133\/revisions\/4141"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4133"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4133"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4133"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}