{"id":3406,"date":"2013-07-26T20:48:57","date_gmt":"2013-07-26T20:48:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=3406"},"modified":"2013-07-26T20:48:57","modified_gmt":"2013-07-26T20:48:57","slug":"finally","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=3406","title":{"rendered":"Finally!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Ok, so I&#8217;ve finally found (what I think will be) a &#8220;classical&#8221; solution to getting a deformation theory for the stack of coherent sheaves in the non-flat setting. I quickly recall the setting.<\/p>\n<p>The problem: Suppose you have a finite type morphism X &#8212;&gt; S of Noetherian algebraic spaces. Let A be a finite type S-algebra. Let F be a coherent sheaf on the base change X<sub>A<\/sub> which is flat over A and has proper support over A. We want to write down some pseudo-coherent complex L on X<sub>A<\/sub> such that for every surjection of S-algebras A&#8217; &#8212;&gt; A with square zero kernel I the ext groups<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Ext<sup>i<\/sup><sub>X<sub>A<\/sub><\/sub>(L, F &otimes;<sub>A<\/sub> I), i = 0, 1, 2<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>give infinitesimal automorphisms, infinitesimal defos, and obstructions.<\/p>\n<p>Derived solution: If you know derived algebraic geometry, then you know how to solve this problem. I tried to sketch the approach <a href=\"http:\/\/stacks.math.columbia.edu\/tag\/08WB\">in this remark<\/a> and now I can answer the question formulated at the end of that remark as follows.<\/p>\n<p>Namely, the question is to construct a complex L such that H<sup>0<\/sup>(L) = F and H<sup>-2<\/sup>(L) = Tor<sub>1<\/sub><sup>O<sub>S<\/sub><\/sup>(O<sub>X<\/sub>, A) &otimes; F. The ingredient I was missing is a canonical map<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>c : L<sub>X<sub>A<\/sub>\/A<\/sub> &#8212;&gt; Tor<sub>1<\/sub><sup>O<sub>S<\/sub><\/sup>(O<sub>X<\/sub>, A)[2]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>You get this map quite easily from the Lichtenbaum-Schlessinger description of the cotangent complex (again, in terms of derived schemes, this follows as X<sub>A<\/sub> is cut out in the derived base change by an ideal which starts with the Tor<sub>1<\/sub> sheaf sitting in cohomological degree -1, but remember that the point here is to NOT use derived methods). OK, now use the Atiyah class<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>F &#8212;> L<sub>X<sub>A<\/sub>\/A<\/sub> &otimes; F[1]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>and compose it with the map above to get F &#8212;> Tor<sub>1<\/sub><sup>O<sub>S<\/sub><\/sup>(O<sub>X<\/sub>, A) &otimes; F[3]. The cone on this map is the desired complex L.<\/p>\n<p>Yay!<\/p>\n<p>PS: Of course, to actually prove that L &#8220;works&#8221; may be somewhat painful.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ok, so I&#8217;ve finally found (what I think will be) a &#8220;classical&#8221; solution to getting a deformation theory for the stack of coherent sheaves in the non-flat setting. I quickly recall the setting. The problem: Suppose you have a finite &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=3406\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3406","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3406","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3406"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3406\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3424,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3406\/revisions\/3424"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3406"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3406"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3406"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}