{"id":3163,"date":"2013-02-21T22:22:50","date_gmt":"2013-02-21T22:22:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=3163"},"modified":"2013-02-21T22:22:50","modified_gmt":"2013-02-21T22:22:50","slug":"derived-lower-shriek","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=3163","title":{"rendered":"Derived lower shriek"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Let (X, O<sub>X<\/sub>) be a ringed space. Let &pi; : <i>C<\/i> &#8212;> X be a stack over X where we use the topology on X to view X as a site. Endow <i>C<\/i> with the topology inherited from X (see <a href=\"http:\/\/stacks.math.columbia.edu\/tag\/06NV\">Definition 06NV<\/a>). This (roughly) means that the fibre categories <i>C<\/i><sub>U<\/sub><\/i> where U &sub; X is open are endowed with the chaotic topology. Denote B = &pi;<sup> -1<\/sup>O<sub>X<\/sub> and think of <i>C<\/i> as a ringed site and &pi; as a morphism of ringed sites<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&pi; : (<i>C<\/i>, B) &#8212;-> (X, O<sub>X<\/sub>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The functor &pi;<sup>*<\/sup> = &pi;<sup> -1<\/sup> : Mod(O<sub>X<\/sub>) &#8212;> Mod(B) commutes with all limits and colimits on modules and hence has a left adjoint &pi;<sub>!<\/sub> : Mod(B) &#8212;> Mod(O<sub>X<\/sub>). In fact, if F is a sheaf of B-modules on <i>C<\/i>, then we can describe &pi;<sub>!<\/sub>F as the sheaf associated to the presheaf<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>U |&#8212;> colim<sub>&xi; in opposite of <i>C<\/i><sub>U<\/sub><\/sub> F(&xi;)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>on the topological space X. (Colimit taken in category O<sub>X<\/sub>(U)-modules.) Actually, it turns out that the situation above is a special case of <a href=\"http:\/\/stacks.math.columbia.edu\/tag\/07AB\">this section of the Stacks project<\/a> and we obtain a left derived extension L&pi;<sub>!<\/sub> : D(B) &#8212;> D(O<sub>X<\/sub>) for free (note there are no boundedness assumptions).<\/p>\n<p>In fact, the construction shows a little bit more. Namely, let &xi; be an object of <i>C<\/i> lying over the open U &sub; X. Then we can consider the localization morphism j<sub>&xi;<\/sub> : <i>C<\/i>\/&xi; &#8212;> <i>C<\/i> and the sheaf O<sub>&xi;<\/sub> = j<sub>&xi;, !<\/sub>B|<sub>&xi;<\/sub>. Any B-module is a quotient of a direct sum of these O<sub>&xi;<\/sub> and we have<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>L&pi;<sub>!<\/sub> O<sub>&xi;<\/sub> = &pi;<sub>!<\/sub> O<sub>&xi;<\/sub><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Cool, so this gives us a bit of control in trying to compute L&pi;<sub>!<\/sub>.<\/p>\n<p>Let x be a point of X. Let <i>C<\/i><sub>x<\/sub> denote the category<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>colim<sub>x &isin; U &sub; X<\/sub> <i>C<\/i><sub>U<\/sub><\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This makes sense as <i>C<\/i> is a stack over X so we can think of it as a sheaf of categories. If F is a sheaf of B-modules on <i>C<\/i>, then the stalk of &pi;<sub>!<\/sub>F is just the colimit of the &#8220;values&#8221; of F over <i>C<\/i><sub>x<\/sub>. Since taking stalks is exact, I think this should mean that we can compute the stalk of L&pi;<sub>!<\/sub>F at x by taking the corresponding construction over the category <i>C<\/i><sub>x<\/sub> with its chaotic topology.<\/p>\n<p>Another tool to compute L&pi;<sub>!<\/sub> should be that if <i>C<\/i> is given as the stackification of a category <i>C<\/i>&#8216; fibred over X, then it should be sufficient to compute with <i>C<\/i>&#8216;. Going back to the discussion and especially the example in <a href=\"http:\/\/math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=3104\">this post<\/a> we have to replace our choice of <i>C<\/i> there. We should start with the fibred category <i>C<\/i>&#8216; of immersions &phi; : U &#8212;> <strong>A<\/strong><sup>n<\/sup><sub>B<\/sub> (not necessarily closed) and commutative diagrams over B. Then <i>C<\/i> should be the stackification of that. Then with all of the above you&#8217;d get the cotangent complex of X\/B by doing the same construction as in the <a href=\"http:\/\/math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=3145\">affine case<\/a>. The key is that affine locally <i>C<\/i>&#8216; has a good co-simplicial object computing the derived lower shriek functor. You use the localization of sheaves of algebras construction to provide <i>C<\/i> with a sheaf of rings surjecting onto the pullback of the structure sheaf of X (and not to change the underlying category).<\/p>\n<p>A similar procedure is going to define the base change <i>C<\/i><sub>S<\/sub> given a morphism of schemes S &#8212;> B, i.e., as underlying fibred category start with some category of diagrams of schemes and use the localization of sheaves of algebras construction to endow this with a structure sheaf.<\/p>\n<p>I think this will just work and in fact it simplifies the original idea I had for the stacks <i>C<\/i> and <i>C<\/i><sub>S<\/sub>. We&#8217;ll see.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Let (X, OX) be a ringed space. Let &pi; : C &#8212;> X be a stack over X where we use the topology on X to view X as a site. Endow C with the topology inherited from X (see &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=3163\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3163","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3163","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3163"}],"version-history":[{"count":29,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3163\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3192,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3163\/revisions\/3192"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3163"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3163"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3163"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}