{"id":2599,"date":"2012-07-09T20:35:30","date_gmt":"2012-07-09T20:35:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=2599"},"modified":"2012-07-09T20:35:30","modified_gmt":"2012-07-09T20:35:30","slug":"an-example","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=2599","title":{"rendered":"An example"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Let k = F_2. Let A = \u220f_n k, i.e., the product of copies of F_2 indexed by the integers. Today, I am going to make a local ring R with a nonzerodivisor t in the maximal ideal such that R[1\/t] is isomorphic to k((t)) \u2297_k A.<\/p>\n<p>Namely, choose a basis B of A as a k-vector space such that some element b_0 &isin; B corresponds to 1 in A. Thus every element of A can be uniquely written as a finite sum of elements of B without repetitions. In particular, given b, b&#8217; \u2208 B we can write bb&#8217; = \u2211_{b&#8221; \u2208 C(b, b&#8217;)} b&#8221; for a finite subset C(b, b&#8217;) of B. Then A has the presentation A = k[b]\/(b_0 &#8211; 1, bb&#8217; &#8211; \u2211_{b&#8221; \u2208 C(b, b&#8217;)} b&#8221;). Consider the ring<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>R = k[[t]][x_b]\/(x_{b_0} &#8211; t, x_bx_{b&#8217;} &#8211; t \u2211_{b&#8221; \u2208 C(b, b&#8217;)} x_{b&#8221;})<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>If we invert t then we can replace x_b by x_b\/t and we get a presentation of k((t)) \u2297_k A. I claim that t is a nonzero divisor in R. To show this you show that {x_b} is a basis of the quotient ring over k[[t]] (this takes a bit of work). Observe that the quotient of R by t is the ring k[x_b]\/(x_{b_0}, x_bx_{b&#8217;}) whose spectrum is a singleton. A bit more work shows every prime ideal of R is contained in the ideal (t, x_b) which implies that R is local.<\/p>\n<p>Let I_{fin} &subset; A be the ideal of elements of A = \u220f_n k consisting of sequences (a_n) such that all but a finite number of a_n are zero. Note that A\/I_{fin} is a flat A-module as I_{fin} is generated by idempotents (every element of A is an idempotent). Let I be the unique radical ideal of R such that I[1\/t] = k((t)) \u2297_k I_{fin} via the isomorphism above. Then we see that M = R\/I is an R-module which is flat over the principal open U defined by t.<\/p>\n<p>I constructed M to illustrate Raynaud-Gruson 5.2.2: Namely, with X = S = Spec(R) and U the open given above there is no finite type blow-up of S such that the strict transform of M becomes flat. The theorem only applies when M restricted to U is of finite presentation; an assumption which our M fails. <\/p>\n<p>My reasoning is as follows. Note that the zero set of I_{fin} is nowhere dense in Spec(A). Hence also V(I) &cap; U is nowhere dense in U because U is homeomorphic to Spec(A). But if the strict transform of M becomes flat on some finite type blow up X&#8217; of Spec(R), then M gets rank 1 over a connected component of the exceptional fibre of X&#8217; &#8212;> X. I think this implies that M has rank 1 over a nonempty open of U as well. I haven&#8217;t check all the details so I could be wrong&#8230; let me know if so! Also, an easier example would be appreciated as well.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Let k = F_2. Let A = \u220f_n k, i.e., the product of copies of F_2 indexed by the integers. Today, I am going to make a local ring R with a nonzerodivisor t in the maximal ideal such that &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=2599\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2599","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2599","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2599"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2599\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2609,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2599\/revisions\/2609"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2599"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2599"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2599"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}