{"id":1712,"date":"2011-07-13T20:22:05","date_gmt":"2011-07-13T20:22:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=1712"},"modified":"2011-07-13T20:22:05","modified_gmt":"2011-07-13T20:22:05","slug":"points-of-the-fppf-topos","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=1712","title":{"rendered":"Points of the fppf topos"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Let S be the affine line over the complex numbers. Consider the big fppf site (Sch\/S)_{fppf} of S. By a theorem of Deligne this site has enough points. How can we describe these points?<\/p>\n<p>Here is one way to construct points. Write S = Spec(<strong>C<\/strong>[x]) and suppose that B is a local <strong>C<\/strong>[x]-algebra such that any faithfully flat, finitely presented ring map B &#8212;&gt; C has a section. Then the functor which associates to an fppf sheaf F the value F(Spec(B)) is a stalk functor, hence determines a point. In fact, I think all points of (Sch\/S)_{fppf} are of this form.<\/p>\n<p>Actually, if B is henselian, then it suffices if finite free ring maps B &#8212;> C have a section; this uses the material discussed <a href=\"http:\/\/math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=1297\" title=\"Comparing Topologies\">here<\/a>. If B is a henselian domain, it suffices if its fraction field is algebraically closed. A specific example is the ring B = \u222a <strong>C<\/strong>[[x]][x^(1\/n)].<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, I was hoping to use this description to say something about question 4 of <a href=\"http:\/\/math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=855\" title=\"Questions\">this post<\/a> on exactness of pushfoward along closed immersions for the fppf topology. I still don&#8217;t know the answer to that question. Do you?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Let S be the affine line over the complex numbers. Consider the big fppf site (Sch\/S)_{fppf} of S. By a theorem of Deligne this site has enough points. How can we describe these points? Here is one way to construct &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=1712\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1712","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1712","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1712"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1712\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1719,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1712\/revisions\/1719"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1712"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1712"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1712"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}