{"id":1152,"date":"2011-01-06T02:18:40","date_gmt":"2011-01-06T02:18:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=1152"},"modified":"2011-01-06T02:18:40","modified_gmt":"2011-01-06T02:18:40","slug":"two-sheaves","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=1152","title":{"rendered":"Two sheaves"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Denote Sch the site of schemes over Q endowed with the fppf topology. Let F = Q(x_1, x_2, x_3, &#8230;) be the purely transcendental extension of Q generated by countably many elements. Let X = Spec(F). Let G = Z[X] be the free abelian sheaf on (the sheaf represented by) X. This sheaf has the following amusing property: If k is a field then<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>G(Spec(k)) = 0 if trdeg(k\/Q) finite, and<\/li>\n<li>G(Spec(k)) is not zero else.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The reason is that Mor_{Sch}(Spec(k), X) = &empty; if the transcendece degree of k is finite.<\/p>\n<p>Here is another amusing abelian sheaf H. For any scheme S in Sch let I_S be the category of arrows f : T &#8212;> S where T is a nonempty connected scheme which is locally of finite type over some field of finite transcendence degree over Q. (Yes, this is a bit contrived.) A morphism (f : T &#8212;> S) &#8212;> (f&#8217; : T&#8217; &#8212;> S) in I_S is a morphism a : T &#8212;> T&#8217; such that f = f&#8217; o a. Define H(S) to be the set of maps &sigma;: Ob(I_S) &#8212;> Z such that &sigma;(f : T &#8212;> S) = &sigma;(f&#8217; : T&#8217; &#8212;> S) if there is a morphism between f and f&#8217; in I_S. In other words, &sigma; is constant on &#8220;connected components&#8221; of Ob(I_S). In the case that Ob(I_S) = &empty; we set H(S) = 0. I claim that H is a sheaf (see remark below). Then H has the following property: if k is a field then<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>H(Spec(k)) = Z if trdeg(k\/Q) is finite, and<\/li>\n<li>H(Spec(k)) = 0 else.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The reason is that if there exists a morphism T &#8212;> Spec(k) with T nonempty and locally of finite type over a field of finite transcendence degree over Q, then k has finite transcendence degree over Q.<\/p>\n<p>Remark: Suppose Sch&#8217; &sub; Sch is a full subcategory consisting of locally Noetherian schemes such that if T is in Sch&#8217; and T&#8217; &#8212;> T is locally of finite type, then T&#8217; is in Sch&#8217;. Then Sch&#8217; is also a site (with fppf topology) and the inclusion functor u : Sch&#8217; &#8212;> Sch is cocontinuous. This gives rise to a morphism of topoi g : Sh(Sch&#8217;) &#8212;> Sh(Sch), see the chapter on Sites and Sheaves in the stacks project. Warning: this morphism of topoi is in the &#8220;wrong&#8221; direction. The sheaf H above is the sheaf g_*Z when we take Sch&#8217; the category of schemes which are locally of finite type over a field of finite transcendence degree over Q. (Note that in our example Sch&#8217; does not have all fibre products, but that doesn&#8217;t matter.)<\/p>\n<p>Conclusion: The category of all schemes (over a given base) is too large to expect (fppf) sheaves to exhibit any kind of &#8220;coherent&#8221; behaviour as the input ranges over spectra of fields.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Denote Sch the site of schemes over Q endowed with the fppf topology. Let F = Q(x_1, x_2, x_3, &#8230;) be the purely transcendental extension of Q generated by countably many elements. Let X = Spec(F). Let G = Z[X] &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=1152\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1152","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1152","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1152"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1152\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1163,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1152\/revisions\/1163"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1152"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1152"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1152"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}