{"id":1139,"date":"2011-01-03T21:03:06","date_gmt":"2011-01-03T21:03:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=1139"},"modified":"2011-01-04T13:35:55","modified_gmt":"2011-01-04T13:35:55","slug":"flat-versus-etale","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=1139","title":{"rendered":"Flat versus etale"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Let S be a scheme. Suppose that G is a sheaf of groups on (Sch\/S)_{fppf}. What kind of conditions guarantee that any fppf torsor is actually an &eacute;tale torsor? I know that if G is representable by an affine smooth group scheme this is OK. So this suggests looking at formally smooth sheaves G. Is there a counter example?<\/p>\n<p>PS: What about the sheaf of the preceding blog post? Here G is formally &eacute;tale.<\/p>\n<p>[Edit Tuesday January 04, 2011. Bhargav just send me the following example of a formally smooth G with an fppf torsor which is not an etale torsor. Let S = Spec(k) where k is separably closed but not algebraically closed of characteristic p > 0. Let F be the sheaf which for a k-algebra R gives<\/p>\n<p>F(Spec(R)) = {r in R | r^{p^n} = 0 for some n > 0}.<\/p>\n<p>In other words F is the colimit of the sheaves alpha_{p^n} of p^n roots of zero. Allowing arbitrary p-power roots of 0 gives formal smoothness. The injective map alpha_p -> F gives fppf F-torsors that are non-trivial because H^1_{fppf}(Spec(k), alpha_p) -> H^1_{fppf}(Spec(k), F) is injective. And H^1_{fppf}(k, alpha_p) is non-zero by non-perfectness of k. But H^1_{etale}(Spec(k), F) = 0 since S has no connected etale covers.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Let S be a scheme. Suppose that G is a sheaf of groups on (Sch\/S)_{fppf}. What kind of conditions guarantee that any fppf torsor is actually an &eacute;tale torsor? I know that if G is representable by an affine smooth &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/?p=1139\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1139","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1139","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1139"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1139\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1149,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1139\/revisions\/1149"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1139"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1139"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~dejong\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1139"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}