--- Manifest	2005-07-11 15:05:04.000000000 -0400
+++ Manifest.new	2005-07-13 16:12:57.000000000 -0400
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
 the patch to the original to obtain the newer file. Even though 
 mathematically speaking there is no difference between submitting a patch 
 or the newer version, it is convenient to think of newer versions in terms
-of patches.
+of patches.  Patches make it all worthwhile!
 
 (a) Patches should be submitted by e-mail to the mailing list for 
 the project. Of course if somebody sends a whole file(system) then it 
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
 well as in the published text.
 
 (d) Small patches should be encouraged. Larger changes should be divided up
-into more smaller changes.
+into more smaller changes.  Rewriting the book entirely is not advised.
 
 (e) Credit issues. The credit model is different in such an open environment. 
 We do not see the point even of having lists of contributors. However, by 
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@
 (f) Currently the concensus seems to be that projects where the goal is 
 to write lecture notes, graduate texts, or introductory books will work 
 better than directly doing research projects in this way. However, we would
-love to be proved wrong.
+love to be proved wrong.  Freeness is commodity pricing.
 
 
 Technical notes (FIXME)