<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Black Holes at the LHC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=60" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=60</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:18:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fábrica de Buracos Negros &#8212; Black Holes Factory &#171; Física Fácil - Easy Physics</title>
		<link>http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=60&#038;cpage=1#comment-37032</link>
		<dc:creator>Fábrica de Buracos Negros &#8212; Black Holes Factory &#171; Física Fácil - Easy Physics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=60#comment-37032</guid>
		<description>[...] create black holes, and might put in risk the LHC itself, Geneve, Switzerland etc&#8230; The the article  published by Columbia, that discusses the fallacy of such a dobtful [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] create black holes, and might put in risk the LHC itself, Geneve, Switzerland etc&#8230; The the article  published by Columbia, that discusses the fallacy of such a dobtful [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alejandro Rivero</title>
		<link>http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=60&#038;cpage=1#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>Alejandro Rivero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=60#comment-571</guid>
		<description>For extra dimensions in general, I like the reinterpretation of Giorgi, Cohen and Arkani, going from 4D to higher dimensions by using a dinamical process and getting symmetry breaking from it. 

Also, to see mathematically the Higgs field as an extra dimension is already a well known theme.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For extra dimensions in general, I like the reinterpretation of Giorgi, Cohen and Arkani, going from 4D to higher dimensions by using a dinamical process and getting symmetry breaking from it. </p>
<p>Also, to see mathematically the Higgs field as an extra dimension is already a well known theme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
